Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Off-Topic
General Chat
Saving the planet
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oldvatr" data-source="post: 2228483" data-attributes="member: 196898"><p>Boyles Law PV = RT</p><p> The words trap heat are not scientific. CO2 absorbs heat during transition from solid phase => liquid phase => gaseous phase. But not much in the static condition, Adiabatic expansion.</p><p></p><p>The very name Greenhouse is a feed across from greenhouses where internal reflection occurrs at the glass / air boundary where the glass traps infra red heat by reflection. It is incorrect to use that term unless talking about an atmospheric inversion layer. Now water vapour gives rise to inversion layers that are visible, as many UFO twitchers will attest to. But I have not seen this attributed to CO2 except by the media and environmentalist activists. It is NOT a 'greenhouse effect'</p><p></p><p>CO2 does absorb photonic energy from the sun, but then it almost immediately re-emits the energy back out and the trapment is in the order of less than a millesecond. If this was a significant effect, then increasing CO2 in the atmosphere would lrad to cooler surface temperatures since the suns energy would be 'trapped; in the CO2 and the heating of the soil by direct sunlight would be reduced in direct proportion/ Also sunbathing would be less productive.. Also CO2 lasers would not work since this readmission of photonic energy is exactly what makes them work. But the CO2 inside the laser does not get hot, but the beam passung through it cuts steel.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oldvatr, post: 2228483, member: 196898"] Boyles Law PV = RT The words trap heat are not scientific. CO2 absorbs heat during transition from solid phase => liquid phase => gaseous phase. But not much in the static condition, Adiabatic expansion. The very name Greenhouse is a feed across from greenhouses where internal reflection occurrs at the glass / air boundary where the glass traps infra red heat by reflection. It is incorrect to use that term unless talking about an atmospheric inversion layer. Now water vapour gives rise to inversion layers that are visible, as many UFO twitchers will attest to. But I have not seen this attributed to CO2 except by the media and environmentalist activists. It is NOT a 'greenhouse effect' CO2 does absorb photonic energy from the sun, but then it almost immediately re-emits the energy back out and the trapment is in the order of less than a millesecond. If this was a significant effect, then increasing CO2 in the atmosphere would lrad to cooler surface temperatures since the suns energy would be 'trapped; in the CO2 and the heating of the soil by direct sunlight would be reduced in direct proportion/ Also sunbathing would be less productive.. Also CO2 lasers would not work since this readmission of photonic energy is exactly what makes them work. But the CO2 inside the laser does not get hot, but the beam passung through it cuts steel. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Off-Topic
General Chat
Saving the planet
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…