I don’t think I did, can’t find the email nowMy meter is eighteen months old now, how old was yours when they replaced it?
I'm not sure what is going on with me/my meter. The past 3 months mySugr has been increasing the estimated HbA1c number. At one point it was increasing 0.1 per day. It now estimates 37.9 down from 38 yesterday.
Batch number is one of those quoted. I get HbA1c results on Tuesday. Depending on the result I may change.
It’s the inconsistency that annoys me. When I started testing and wasn’t aware what the readings were likely to be I didn’t really notice. I think now I know what each test is likely to be it irritates meIt was 9 months old but had a heck of a lot of use in that 9 months!
I gave up on the Codefree in January 2017 and switched to using the Accu Chek Mobile. This was due to the inconsistencies in the Codefree. I have no real evidence that the Accu Chek reads any lower or higher on average, but it is consistent and gives me readings I expect with hardly any silly readings. I do know from threads on this forum going back to 2014 that the Codefree has a tendency to read high. That in itself isn't a problem for us non-insulin users, and can be advantageous. The problem is the inconsistency.
I think you are correct. It is dependent on the data entered. I trialed diabetes:m for a few days and the estimated HbA1c was similar to mySugr. I have changed the time on my CodeFree, the date was correct.I’d be interested to know how MySugr works out the HbA1c, I suspect it’s simply an average of the numbers inputted (is that even a word?!) and doesn’t have the bias to the previous 3-4 weeks which a true HbA1c test has. If I’m right then MySugr will be accurate if you have stable sugars but will show a delayed result if not. I hope that explaination is understandable!
I think you are correct. It is dependent on the data entered. I trialed diabetes:m for a few days and the estimated HbA1c was similar to mySugr. I have changed the time on my CodeFree, the date was correct.
I can't blame BST it thought it was 3:00 am!Did you change it when we changed from summer time to GMT? I forgot to do that with my Accu Chek until I realised it was an hour wrong.
Thanks for posting that, it makes the point of the Code Free reading consistently higher.Just for interest I am enclosing my average of averages (2018) graph of this years events, which clearly shows the difference I experience with my SD and Dual meters.
My GP has asked that I have a target average of 7 mmol/l in mind since previously I had been going below 6 and having small hypo's which he does not like to see me doing.
The graph is event driven, and it is clear that my bgl has increased since I reduced my Metformin. Recently I have been having bad choices for meals and a lot of stress which has also pushed me up. However, I am able to report that I am getting back into control and ignoring the carbophiles I live with. They can cook their own carbs if they want to.
Just to reinforce it, I have this same tyoe of graph from 3 years ago when I was testing against my GP supplied XCEED, and last year whe I was running it against my GP supplied NEO. In each case the characeristic was similar with a very similar fixed differential between them.Thanks for posting that, it makes the point of the Code Free reading consistently higher.
Although I do not use ketone strips myself (yet) I believe they have shorter shelf life than the bgl stripsAfter much humming and hawing, I bit the bullet and have put in an order for the caresens dual. I need a spare now the surgery have stopped my prescription for strips. They will phone me tomorrow for payment details. I will ask when the ketone strips are due in. They are something I would only use on occasion.
Thanks, I will ask tomorrow. I want to try extended fasting at some point.Although I do not use ketone strips myself (yet) I believe they have shorter shelf life than the bgl strips
Interesting. It could explain why mySugr gives me an estimated HbA1c number which has been 2 or 3 points above my lab HbA1c. I get my next result on the 16th. I will also run parallel testing for a time. I will also dig out the spreadsheet husband did for me which gives the plus or minus 15 percent error margins.Update on a previous posting of mine.
I have just started a new batch of codefree strips today, and because I am parallel testing I can immediarely see that the SD meter is now reading between 2 and 3 mmol.l higher than my Dual even at near hypo territory (4,3 mmol/l). This is after doing retests on both, so it is not misreads.
The new Lot no is: S0318054
If my Codefree ever gives me a reading of 3.9 then I would myself be quite worried, since my SD is reading at least 1 mmol/l high, then that would make my reading 2.9 which is quite definitely in Hypoland. Even allowing for the +/- 0.8 mmol/l allowed variation in readings at that range that could still be a worrying 3.1 mmol/l even for a meter reading accurately. This was what drove me to parallel test so that I can make a valued judgement. So yes, knowing the characteristic of how your meter varies is necessary when getting readings below 5 mmol/l, especially if you drive like I do,Interesting. It could explain why mySugr gives me an estimated HbA1c number which has been 2 or 3 points above my lab HbA1c. I get my next result on the 16th. I will also run parallel testing for a time. I will also dig out the spreadsheet husband did for me which gives the plus or minus 15 percent error margins.
I don't mind if the CodeFree runs a little high, I just need to know for sure. I am unlikely to get hypos, my lowest ever reading was 3.9.
I’m waiting for my Care Sens strips to arrive so I reserve judgement, but I’m hoping the larger cost is reflected in better quality strips meaning less rogue readings, requiring less (or no) retests and so mitigate part of the higher price.Looks like I’m going to have to bite the bullet and get some Dualsens strips for some comparison testing. At close to,double the price of the bulk buy Codefree strips, kinda sticks in the throat but need to be sure of what is going on.
I’m waiting for my Care Sens strips to arrive so I reserve judgement, but I’m hoping the larger cost is reflected in better quality strips meaning less rogue readings, requiring less (or no) retests and so mitigate part of the higher price.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?