- Messages
- 10,230
- Location
- New Zealand
- Type of diabetes
- Type 1
- Treatment type
- Pump
- Dislikes
- hypos and forum bugs
My 90 year old T2 (for a decade) dad, hba1c low 50s when unmedicated (low carbing) had his annual diabetic eye test a month ago. He was told that all was well. He's now received a new appointment at a different hospital for a second "different" eye test. He's already phoned them once to be told it's a different test, but is going to try again. (He's not keen on the hospital because he has mobility issues and it requires a lot of walking, and he has been heavily covid shielding so would prefer not to visit hospital at all if it can be put off till after a covid vaccine).
So, any suggestions on what could be going on here? Why a second test if the first is fine? Testing for glaucoma?
It's possible that the diabetic eye screening found no problems with diabetic retinopathy (hence the 'all is well' results) but spotted something non-diabetic (such as glaucomatous changes) and informed the GP. If so, the GP would review the patient notes and make a decision whether a referral was necessary. Your dad needs to ask his GP why he has been referred to hospital.My 90 year old T2 (for a decade) dad, hba1c low 50s when unmedicated (low carbing) had his annual diabetic eye test a month ago. He was told that all was well. He's now received a new appointment at a different hospital for a second "different" eye test. He's already phoned them once to be told it's a different test, but is going to try again. (He's not keen on the hospital because he has mobility issues and it requires a lot of walking, and he has been heavily covid shielding so would prefer not to visit hospital at all if it can be put off till after a covid vaccine).
So, any suggestions on what could be going on here? Why a second test if the first is fine? Testing for glaucoma?
It's possible that the diabetic eye screening found no problems with diabetic retinopathy (hence the 'all is well' results) but spotted something non-diabetic (such as glaucomatous changes) and informed the GP. If so, the GP would review the patient notes and make a decision whether a referral was necessary. Your dad needs to ask his GP why he has been referred to hospital.
Ah, when you said the result was 'all is well' I assumed you were talking about a results letter. Photographers aren't allowed to comment on the screening results at the time of photography because the camera doesn't show the photos in enough detail and also for quality control reasons. If it was a verbal 'all is well' it might just mean that the photographer was saying that they had managed to take clear photos.Well, he's tried calling the surgery, and no one could tell him anything, but they did give him a number for the hospital, so he's going to try that on Monday. I'm not convinced that it's not a diabetic issue, TBH, because depending on who took the photoes they don't always tell you at the time, and maybe the photographer just made some reassuring noises? Will update here when we eventually even get to the bottom of it.
However, his GP should have had a copy of the results and if the diabetic eye screening programme had made the referral the GP should have a notification of this in the GP report.
That's interesting. His GP has told him zilch other than giving him an additional phone number for the eye hospital....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?