I've been taking 40mg simvastatin since December 2010 (total cholesterol at that point 5.2) and I'm wondering if I really need to.
One of my current library books, yet awaiting full digestion, is The Great Cholesterol Con, by Dr Malcolm Kendrick.
I found the following, which may answer your question :
"In short, statins do not save lives in women.
Statins do not save lives in women.
Statins do not save lives in women.
Statins do not save lives in women.
Is it possible to highlight how important this fact actually is ?
STATINS DO NOT SAVE LIVES IN WOMEN !"
and
"someone asked the University of British Columbia researchers the question 'What is the evidence of benefit for primary prevention in women, in heart disease ?' Their reply :
There were 10,990 women in the primary prevention trials ... only coronary events were reported for women, but when these were pooled they were not reduced by statin therapy ... Thus the coronary benefit in primary prevention trials appears to be limited to men.
In short, in primary prevention, statins not only have zero effect on overall mortality, they also have zero effect on reducing heart disease in women. So you get absolutely no benefits at all. I suppose this may all seem almost unbelievable, given the ludicrous levels of hype surrounding statins, but it's true."
I think he's unsupportive of statin therapy, and the money he claims your GP will get for getting your levels below a threshold of 5.
Over to you
Geoff