Be aware that both your morning fasting levels and your 2 hour after meal readings need to be taken account of when considering insulin (or just more tablets). My fasting was typically below 10 but my post meal readings were going into the 20s despite low-carbing and three level tablets. Hence the need for me to go onto insulin with an HBa1C that shot up to 8.3%. The NICE Diabetes Pathways doc gives excellent guidance on this (Google it). If your HBa1C goes over 7.5% then your medication does need to be increased. BTW do think about whether you want the statins or not. They have nothing to do with diabetes and the recommendation is that they should be given to those with a high risk of cardio problems.Thank you everybody for your input, it's been really interesting. I'm not going to push for a LADA diagnosis at the moment as firstly, I don't think I'll get one in any case! and secondly, as mo1905 pointed out, it won't make any difference to my treatment. My consultants and DSN aren't daft, they know what's going on and they're keeping a really close eye on things.
@Ian DP - I did question my medication on my last visit, however they deem it necessary to keep my BG down in the evenings and are not yet comfortable starting me on insulin because of my daytime fasting levels. Not sure how I feel about it, I think I've been mostly burying my head in the sand for the past 12 months and now I need to face up to it and educate myself. Do you know if the lchf diet might have a negative impact on my Cholesterol? I found out yesterday they want to start me on statins
Interestingly, I have read that a Swansea hospital is trialing LADA diagnoses to try and establish whether it does make a difference to outcomes . it was only a short reference in an online article, so can't be sure of authenticity.
Typing on Android touch keyboard makes posting on forums a bit of a nightmare, it seems to take forever! May have to resurrect laptop :/
Be aware that both your morning fasting levels and your 2 hour after meal readings need to be taken account of when considering insulin (or just more tablets). My fasting was typically below 10 but my post meal readings were going into the 20s despite low-carbing and three level tablets. Hence the need for me to go onto insulin with an HBa1C that shot up to 8.3%. The NICE Diabetes Pathways doc gives excellent guidance on this (Google it). If your HBa1C goes over 7.5% then your medication does need to be increased. BTW do think about whether you want the statins or not. They have nothing to do with diabetes and the recommendation is that they should be given to those with a high risk of cardio problems.
Interesting about Swansea.
In the long term I agree it makes no difference to treatment. Twenty odd years after diagnosis I am a T1 and LADA or not is ancient history. However I do think treatment potentially could be different for LADA at diagnosis and for the first few years. In hindsight I wish I had had that opportunity. I would most of all liked to have therapy which made the top priority the preservation of beta cell function for as long as possible, probably through early insulin therapy, insulin sensitivity approaches, and carb reduction. By accident the "misdiagnosis" of classic T1 rather than LADA does provide early insulin therapy so I am grateful for that.
OP if I were you I would reject any pancreas stimulating drugs for fear they accelerate final beta cell failure. And for the same reason I would go on insulin right away, take metformin and do strength exercises for improved insulin sensitivity, and go low carb. And only take statins if those changes don't improve your lipid ratios - ignoring total cholesterol which is a meaningless measure.
Sent from the Diabetes Forum App
When you had the hypos were you also on the pancreas stimulating drug? That, alone or in combination with metformin, is a more likely cause of the hypos. Have you ever been on metformin alone and had those hypos?I am worried about the drugs I'm on speeding the process, however I can't take metformin, I know it's not meant to happen, but my body reacted to it with multiple daily hypos (as low as 1.8 and regularly 2.5) and although it settled as soon as I was taken off it, they re extremely reluctant to start me on insulin while I'm sometimes seeing levels of 3.5 before meals and my A1c is 6.5% DSN told me insulin is too likely to cause hypos at this stage and I don't feel I understand the situation well enough yet to be able to question that.
I think it's my reaction to metformin and low BP which makes them keep testing for Addison's, although all tests negative so far. They seem pretty convinced that something else is going on that no one's worked out yet... It's all a bit scary
No, metformin 500mg twice daily, nothing else. They then tried without medication for a few months and decided on repaglinide when the numbers started going up. We were all completely baffled as aware that metformin is the one drug that just shouldn't do that! They theorised that maybe my body is prone to lows and metformin just helped it achieve that more quickly ... Hence the suspicions of Addison's and the horrible tests!When you had the hypos were you also on the pancreas stimulating drug? That, alone or in combination with metformin, is a more likely cause of the hypos. Have you ever been on metformin alone and had those hypos?
Sent from the Diabetes Forum App
Hi Pinkerbell,
Following this thread with great interest - I think you touch on many important aspects of how to get to optimal treatment for interim diabetics most efficiently. Sadly NHS is struggling on this front.
I'm in same camp as Phoenix and Spiker - at diagnosis (age 51) I was classified Type 1 (based on almost 0 c peptide and +++ GAD antibodies), so straight to insulin treatment. But with hindsight probably a few years of LADA. That said, both endocrinologist in Asia and diabetic nurse specialist in UK said to me that they believe immediate aggressive insulin therapy is key to extending any diminishing beta cell function. Obviously only works with comprehensive bg monitoring...so you must have access to as many test strips as necessary....catch 22 under NHS if not already classified type 1?
BTW do note it is known (at least in USA) that some diabetics can show very positive GAD antibodies, but still have insulin production - full blown autoimmune Type 1 should show almost zero c peptide (insulin marker) as well.
It's not the treatment that concerns me so much as attitudes and support. I do feel well pretty well looked after by the specialist teams at my local hospital and GP surgery, with the exception of the nutritionist who told me she couldn't give me any advice until I was on insulin. My main gripe is with some non specialist health professionals, who look at me incredulously when I state that I am type one, but not yet on insulin. I've been told it's 'impossible' and am occasionally made to feel as if I'm stupid, lying or both! I think it's possible that if more diagnoses were made, it might raise awareness of this condition. The possibility that I might one day encounter a health professional with that attitude whilst not in fit state to explain my condition is a bit scary.
Question?
Is type2 taking insulin, possibly LADA?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?