Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Ask A Question
Stage 3 kidney disease
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oldvatr" data-source="post: 2515904" data-attributes="member: 196898"><p>Well I started to decode the paper, and I come to the conclusion that the authors appear to be very learned, but I think they are bending the svidence to meet their agenda, and hoping no one actually reads what they have writen.</p><p>For instance, they claim that iron causes major tissue damage as evidenced by ischemia-reperfusion injury. Now that event is where a blood clot or embolism is removed and the tissue downwind of the clot becomes de-oxygenated, then blood returns after the blockage is removed. Actually, tissue dies because it does not get oxygen from the stagnant blood in the artery, and the red blood cells rupture and spill their contents. Now haemoglobin contains iron as an essential component, and this gets smeared around the wound tissue, so no wonder the tissue damage has a high iron content. It is not, per se, the cause of the event it is the consequence. Wrong explanation! I get the feeling we are being blinded by science.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oldvatr, post: 2515904, member: 196898"] Well I started to decode the paper, and I come to the conclusion that the authors appear to be very learned, but I think they are bending the svidence to meet their agenda, and hoping no one actually reads what they have writen. For instance, they claim that iron causes major tissue damage as evidenced by ischemia-reperfusion injury. Now that event is where a blood clot or embolism is removed and the tissue downwind of the clot becomes de-oxygenated, then blood returns after the blockage is removed. Actually, tissue dies because it does not get oxygen from the stagnant blood in the artery, and the red blood cells rupture and spill their contents. Now haemoglobin contains iron as an essential component, and this gets smeared around the wound tissue, so no wonder the tissue damage has a high iron content. It is not, per se, the cause of the event it is the consequence. Wrong explanation! I get the feeling we are being blinded by science. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Ask A Question
Stage 3 kidney disease
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…