Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
Statins
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="suejat" data-source="post: 1883384" data-attributes="member: 46714"><p>Do your own research, and make up your own mind. There is a lot of research out there. Personally I am against statins big time. Not just because of the side effects, but because I believe that lowering cholesterol to the ridiculously low levels that doctors seem to think necessary now, is downright dangerous. High cholesterol is a symptom, not a cause. Switzerland has the lowest incidence of cardiovascular incidents in the western world AND the HIGHEST average levels of blood cholesterol. Dr Malcolm Kendrick did a meta-analysis of 70,000 people and found that 92% of those with high cholesterol lived longer than all those with low. 72%of heart attack sufferers have normal to low cholesterol. I think it was the Cochrane collaboration (I could be wrong about who actually did this one, but not the results) did a huge meta-analysis on behalf of the WHO which found that although those with a naturally low BP had a built in resistance to cardiovascular and kidney problems, there was no benefit to lowering BP artificially below 140/90, and that statins might ?(and this was put down to statistical error)increase life expectancy by 1 DAY. Cholesterol is vital for cell regeneration. Your body cannot make new cells without it as it plays a major role in the production of cell membranes.</p><p>This is just my opinion, and although I vent a lot about it, please do your own research and make up your own mind.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="suejat, post: 1883384, member: 46714"] Do your own research, and make up your own mind. There is a lot of research out there. Personally I am against statins big time. Not just because of the side effects, but because I believe that lowering cholesterol to the ridiculously low levels that doctors seem to think necessary now, is downright dangerous. High cholesterol is a symptom, not a cause. Switzerland has the lowest incidence of cardiovascular incidents in the western world AND the HIGHEST average levels of blood cholesterol. Dr Malcolm Kendrick did a meta-analysis of 70,000 people and found that 92% of those with high cholesterol lived longer than all those with low. 72%of heart attack sufferers have normal to low cholesterol. I think it was the Cochrane collaboration (I could be wrong about who actually did this one, but not the results) did a huge meta-analysis on behalf of the WHO which found that although those with a naturally low BP had a built in resistance to cardiovascular and kidney problems, there was no benefit to lowering BP artificially below 140/90, and that statins might ?(and this was put down to statistical error)increase life expectancy by 1 DAY. Cholesterol is vital for cell regeneration. Your body cannot make new cells without it as it plays a major role in the production of cell membranes. This is just my opinion, and although I vent a lot about it, please do your own research and make up your own mind. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
Statins
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…