As I understand it haemoglobin has a life span of 3 months and glucose attaches to it so it would seem logical that as time passes toward the 3 months the haemoglobin with the high glucose will be dying off and will be replaced by ones without high glucose. However, there is little sign of any improvement after 2 months.
Rates are between 3.6 - 5.2 which I don't think class as high.
Does anyone have any idea how soon I could expect improvement and if reduction of blood glucose slows progression of retinopathy? Sorry to bother you all but I'm unable to find information anywhere.
unable to find information anywhere.
fats are not involved in any way,
and are actually advisable
Have you not been diagnosed by a doctor then ? You won't be on the diabetic register if you haven't .I diagnosed myself with diabetes in February and immediately went on a diet to reduce carbs, salt and fat while the NHS assured themselves of the diagnosis. Since then have had styes, acne (which I've had for years on and off) and have a bloodshot eye which I fear is retinopathy though the NHS don't seem very concerned about it although they are arranging an appointment for an eye check. I can't find any information anywhere about the timescale of any improvement of these symptoms.
As I understand it haemoglobin has a life span of 3 months and glucose attaches to it so it would seem logical that as time passes toward the 3 months the haemoglobin with the high glucose will be dying off and will be replaced by ones without high glucose. However, there is little sign of any improvement after 2 months. The NHS don't want me to test because of cost so I bought my own kit but have only been testing for a couple of weeks. Rates are between 3.6 - 5.2 which I don't think class as high.
Does anyone have any idea how soon I could expect improvement and if reduction of blood glucose slows progression of retinopathy? Sorry to bother you all but I'm unable to find information anywhere.
Ah - I should have made it clear that I meant as part of diet - that is the input of fats as food doesn't impact on the insulin and blood glucose problems specific to diabetes.Beg to differ, possibly not 100% accurate. There are several sources if you Google and several explanations as to how it works including: through a series of metabolic processes that result from conditions of depleted carbohydrates, it is possible for stored fats to be broken down into glucose, which can then be converted into glycogen.
Same goes for protein. I would like to nominate myself as living proof. Low carb has kept my BG and HbA1c in excellent ranges for 3 or so years. Then my GP said you need to eat more so I upped dairy (fats). BG higher, HbA1c higher, cholesterol higher, weight higher.
Not for everyone, we really are all different. The only conclusion I can draw for ME is increased fats was a very bad idea.
Except babies have always had mother's milk with lactose.I suspect that we don't do well with dairy products - some more than others, as it is a fairly recent - in evolutionary terms - alteration to the human diet.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?