Hesitate to post this fearing an angry or impatient response.
Bear with me, I believe eating sugar is bad, particularly so for diabetics.
Sugar leads to various horrible blood glucose complications, and likely abets cancer, ageing & Alzheimers.
So can someone explain the following paradox:
I aim for a low-carb diet, but 2 hours after eating, blood glucose very rarely below 7
I practice intermittent fasting, that's fasting for 24 hours one day a week, blood glucose at the end of that never below 6.1
BUT, occasionally, I 'treat' myself to a cappuccino with 2gm sugar; 2 hours later my blood glucose 5 to 5.5
What's going on?
For me, a coffee with 2gm sugar is always the quickest way to reduce my blood glucose to its lowest levels.
Bear with me, I believe eating sugar is bad, particularly so for diabetics.
Sugar leads to various horrible blood glucose complications, and likely abets cancer, ageing & Alzheimers.
So can someone explain the following paradox:
I aim for a low-carb diet, but 2 hours after eating, blood glucose very rarely below 7
I practice intermittent fasting, that's fasting for 24 hours one day a week, blood glucose at the end of that never below 6.1
BUT, occasionally, I 'treat' myself to a cappuccino with 2gm sugar; 2 hours later my blood glucose 5 to 5.5
What's going on?
For me, a coffee with 2gm sugar is always the quickest way to reduce my blood glucose to its lowest levels.