Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
Sugar Tax
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ickihun" data-source="post: 1098080" data-attributes="member: 196960"><p>Isn't a hypo best treated by fizzy high sugary liquids to save your teeth, get the sugar quicker in your system. (Fizzy anything works quicker, apparently) and a quick fix til you have food?</p><p>T1s like T2s have to try and keep their sugar levels, level.</p><p>I know a few T1s in my life who were constantly encouraged to get those starchy carbs in. Hence keeping their level higher. Leading to a bounce back and very difficult levels to manage. Unmanageable. Being a T1 has it's own challenges and of which I truely respect. So if original lucoxade could be exempt to help with that task I would be a lot happier. </p><p>I know T2s have managing costs but through experience T1 hypo and hyper comas are very frightening and life threatening, sometimes without warning. Not an easy situation to cope with when money is an issue too.</p><p>T2 diabetes can have a slower dangerous effect on your life (none insulin dependants) where as T1 is much quicker instant threat to your life. Action is imperative.</p><p>Taking away that aid for monetary reasons is very very harsh!</p><p>Vunerable diabetics should not be put in a worse position. Ever.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ickihun, post: 1098080, member: 196960"] Isn't a hypo best treated by fizzy high sugary liquids to save your teeth, get the sugar quicker in your system. (Fizzy anything works quicker, apparently) and a quick fix til you have food? T1s like T2s have to try and keep their sugar levels, level. I know a few T1s in my life who were constantly encouraged to get those starchy carbs in. Hence keeping their level higher. Leading to a bounce back and very difficult levels to manage. Unmanageable. Being a T1 has it's own challenges and of which I truely respect. So if original lucoxade could be exempt to help with that task I would be a lot happier. I know T2s have managing costs but through experience T1 hypo and hyper comas are very frightening and life threatening, sometimes without warning. Not an easy situation to cope with when money is an issue too. T2 diabetes can have a slower dangerous effect on your life (none insulin dependants) where as T1 is much quicker instant threat to your life. Action is imperative. Taking away that aid for monetary reasons is very very harsh! Vunerable diabetics should not be put in a worse position. Ever. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
Sugar Tax
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…