Me too. I found it interesting all round.Because a hour long programme cannot cover everything regarding food, can it ? Being coeliac myself, the programme interested me.
The first part of the program involved Sian Williams highlighting the sugar content in these “on the hoof” breakfast cereals. What was interesting was that whilst she used sugar cubes to illustrate her point she didn’t convert carbohydrates into sugar equivalents and was only going on added sugar.
One or two of the Dieticians comments were controversial.
And some members never fail to put a downer on LCHF, funny that?
Me too. I found it interesting all round.
I didn't see the programme but when I saw it advertised I knew there would be criticism on here about it especially if they did not mention low carb. As you say all we have to do is look at the normal foods in supermarkets and buy the appropriate foods for our own chosen carb levelVery true, especially in your first sentence, the rate that some people criticize and get worked up about it are are ones who could end up with medical conditions regarding stress and sore knee's too. On your marks, get set, criticize..............lol
I looked at the programme because Coeliac and free from foods were mentioned. The programme was 1 hour long, now it may or may not cover 'low carb' (or as I call it, reduced carbs) in the future, because, there are plenty of foods in the supermarket already. '
A 1 hour programme cannot cover all avenue's regarding dietary choices, requirements or medical conditions regarding food.
I didn't see the programme but when I saw it advertised I knew there would be criticism on here about it especially if they did not mention low carb. As you say all we have to do is look at the normal foods in supermarkets and buy the appropriate foods for our own chosen carb level
Every time there is a food programme on TV some people here always find something to criticise in it. The most common complaint is it does not mention low carb. Just because a small percentage of diabetics most of who are on this group find it helpful some seem to think it should be the diet for everyone Most of the food programmes are demonised as being to high in carbs but they are not about low carb and why should they be. I do not think anyone would choose to eat the low carb way when they have no need to .How many here would go low carb if they did not have diabetes I know I wouldn't
I agree that we can't expect a mainstream programme to cater to a minority but those diagnosed with type 2 are just the tip of the iceberg and it is a big iceberg which on its' current trajectory will sink the NHS as we know it.Every time there is a food programme on TV some people here always find something to criticise in it. The most common complaint is it does not mention low carb. Just because a small percentage of diabetics most of who are on this group find it helpful some seem to think it should be the diet for everyone Most of the food programmes are demonised as being to high in carbs but they are not about low carb and why should they be. I do not think anyone would choose to eat the low carb way when they have no need to .How many here would go low carb if they did not have diabetes I know I wouldn't
That grabbed my attention, yes. Handy if we go the full Monty on March 29th.The apples being up to a year long in storage, wow !!
I tend to think we are talking about a large minority or even a majority, the way things are trending.I agree that we can't expect a mainstream programme to cater to a minority but those diagnosed with type 2 are just the tip of the iceberg and it is a big iceberg which on its' current trajectory will sink the NHS as we know it.
If a big minority of the population ( in the US estimated to be 66%) are diabetic t2 or pre -diabetic arguably because we've all been eating highly processed and sweet carby foods since the early 80s, when food manufacturers responded to public health guidance to reduce fat and we got too busy to cook.
Perhaps low carb just needs re branding to avoid its current reputation as being faddy, as REAL FOOD or how we use to eat before food came from factories rather than farms.
I like the emphasis of tv chefs like Tom Kerridge, Jamie Oliver and Hugh FW on cooking from scratch which even if it includes a few carbs will prevent problems for most of the population.
we have to do is look at the normal foods in supermarkets
11% in China and 8-0% here but lots more un-diagnosed or pre diabetic. If we include those with the associated metabolic problems (fat in the wrong places even if slim, high blood pressure, low levels of good cholesterol) then I'd agree it is or will soon be a majority.I tend to think we are talking about a large minority or even a majority, the way things are trending.
Don't they reckon that these days 12% of the US adult population is metabolically healthy11% in China and 8-0% here but lots more un-diagnosed or pre diabetic. If we include those with the associated metabolic problems (fat in the wrong places even if slim, high blood pressure, low levels of good cholesterol) then I'd agree it is or will soon be a majority.
Indeed. It’s like the Titanic and the iceberg.11% in China and 8-0% here but lots more un-diagnosed or pre diabetic. If we include those with the associated metabolic problems (fat in the wrong places even if slim, high blood pressure, low levels of good cholesterol) then I'd agree it is or will soon be a majority.
And what about chlorinated chicken then eh? Do we have that to look forward to?Next weeks programme, Thursday 14th, channel 5 @ 8pm, is lifting the lid on supermarket meat, revealing what's in a budget sausage and the conditions in which cheap, and pricier organic, chickens are raised !
I am never sure how they estimate the 'undiagnosed' other than that you extrapolate backwards from the diagnosed type 2s perhaps.....I think the US insurers just get out of whichever state they won't make a profit in thus leaving the ER to pick up the care OR they will whack up the premiums.Don't they reckon that these days 12% of the US adult population is metabolically healthy
The other 88% are ill or becoming ill.. a frightening statistic.. watch out for US healthcare insures going bust!
Maybe they can come up with a guesstimate based partly on what many people are typically eating right now, a huge number crunching exercise but still doable.I am never sure how they estimate the 'undiagnosed' other than that you extrapolate backwards from the diagnosed type 2s perhaps.....I think the US insurers just get out of whichever state they won't make a profit in thus leaving the ER to pick up the care OR they will whack up the premiums.
Fascinating to listen to the guy from SwissRe over at live stream Low Carb Denver (via Diet Doctor)! Seems to be suggesting some useful ideas given they have a direct profit motive!
Normal foods like eggs, meat, fish, dairy like yogurt, cream, milk and cheese, vegetables, olives, avocados, olive oil and for those that eat it low carb bread all on the normal food shelves.And how would you define those precisely?
Fresh raw ingredients that aren't in a package perhaps..?
Like the foods consumed by people who follow a ketogenic way of eating maybe?
The ones that would probably benefit the majority of the population..... those "normal foods" ?
Maybe they can come up with a guesstimate based partly on what many people are typically eating right now, a huge number crunching exercise but still doable.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?