tree-peony said:what is WRONG with these people????? :roll:
kick her on the shins and run away :wink:
Why are you even laughing? T hats the best idea I have heard for years! :lol:ladybird64 said:tree-peony said:what is WRONG with these people????? :roll:
kick her on the shins and run away :wink:
I haven't laughed out loud for a while but that just hit the spot! :clap:
Changes in blood glucose tend may result in changes in vision. For this reason, there is not much point in getting a new prescription when your levels are changing - such as after starting new medication.Nurse said I shouldn't have gone
Again, perhaps not very well put but sadly not entirely unfounded. Metformin doesn't "fix" the problem the way antibiotics would cure a bacterial infection, so it is likely that your levels are OK because you are currently taking Metformin.Asked when I might be able to reduce my metformin - given that my levels are good "oh, you might never be able to reduce it, in fact you might end up on insulin"......
Well, this is about how you define diabetes. Diagnostic criteria are fasting BG > 7 mmol/l or random BG > 11.1, so anyone with fasting BG = 7.5 is technically diabetic. Nerve damage is not immediate."You might well have had the disease for 5 years" - given that I've no signs of any nerve damage anywhere I find that hard to believe
Again, a sad truth. The problem here is that complications can have fairly extreme consequences - minor foot injuries that are not noticed due to nerve damage resulting in amputation is the prime example."you are likely to suffer from complications at some point"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?