Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Off-Topic
General Chat
The SCREAM thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DCUKMod" data-source="post: 1840534" data-attributes="member: 345386"><p>Annoyingly, the rules on who needs what when change over time, so it may not have been required when you bought, Patsy, unless you bought in very recent years. The reason you are being asked to provide the insurance could be there is a difficulty insuring a property they don't own, until completions, so there could, potentially, be a chicken and egg situation in play?</p><p></p><p>Why not stipulate that you will provide the insurance, but the cost to be paid by the buyers? If they say no, you have a choice, but if contracts are signed, and exchanged already, be very careful of the penalties for withdrawal at this stage. They are significant and would, I feel certain, put the cost of the insurance into the shade.</p><p></p><p>If, on the other hand, you haven't exchanged contracts (and exchanging is the issue, not signing), you aren't legally bound, but will already be several hundred, if not thousands down in legal and disbursement costs which you would still be liable for.</p><p></p><p>Moving isn't for the feint hearted.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DCUKMod, post: 1840534, member: 345386"] Annoyingly, the rules on who needs what when change over time, so it may not have been required when you bought, Patsy, unless you bought in very recent years. The reason you are being asked to provide the insurance could be there is a difficulty insuring a property they don't own, until completions, so there could, potentially, be a chicken and egg situation in play? Why not stipulate that you will provide the insurance, but the cost to be paid by the buyers? If they say no, you have a choice, but if contracts are signed, and exchanged already, be very careful of the penalties for withdrawal at this stage. They are significant and would, I feel certain, put the cost of the insurance into the shade. If, on the other hand, you haven't exchanged contracts (and exchanging is the issue, not signing), you aren't legally bound, but will already be several hundred, if not thousands down in legal and disbursement costs which you would still be liable for. Moving isn't for the feint hearted. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Off-Topic
General Chat
The SCREAM thread
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…