Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Management
Blood Glucose Monitoring
This Picture May Help People New to Testing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EdMac" data-source="post: 1141740" data-attributes="member: 246967"><p>[USER=211504]@TorqPenderloin[/USER] obviously this demonstrates a lack of consistency between meters. How about consistency of the same meter over time? For example does the meter providing the low reading always give a low reading?</p><p></p><p>I just watched the 'Control Test' video for the accu-check aviva. I would use the Level 1 control solution and it states the acceptable range is 1.7 - 3.3. In the context of monitoring a FBG range of 4.5 to 6.0 the acceptable calibration range is fairly wide ie. giving pretty poor confidence limits for an actual test? (in this case wider than the range I'm actually monitoring). Does this suggest the meters are not great for monitoring lower end steady FBG's? Or am I misinterpreting something?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EdMac, post: 1141740, member: 246967"] [USER=211504]@TorqPenderloin[/USER] obviously this demonstrates a lack of consistency between meters. How about consistency of the same meter over time? For example does the meter providing the low reading always give a low reading? I just watched the 'Control Test' video for the accu-check aviva. I would use the Level 1 control solution and it states the acceptable range is 1.7 - 3.3. In the context of monitoring a FBG range of 4.5 to 6.0 the acceptable calibration range is fairly wide ie. giving pretty poor confidence limits for an actual test? (in this case wider than the range I'm actually monitoring). Does this suggest the meters are not great for monitoring lower end steady FBG's? Or am I misinterpreting something? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Management
Blood Glucose Monitoring
This Picture May Help People New to Testing
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…