The fact that dietitians are accredited by 'totally captured by the food industry' associations like the British and Australian ones is a huge red flag. Avoid like the plague is my motto
My cynicism is now complete - the first thing I want to know about any 'professional' organisation and/or 'charity' is who their sponsors are. Follow the money!
One does not require membership of a professional organization in order to practise. Accreditation results from the award of meeting the tertiary requirements. The association is no different to any other including unions. They all have the self interest of their members at heart. Every industry has them.The fact that dietitians are accredited by 'totally captured by the food industry' associations like the British and Australian ones is a huge red flag. Avoid like the plague is my motto
My cynicism is now complete - the first thing I want to know about any 'professional' organisation and/or 'charity' is who their sponsors are. Follow the money!
My understanding is that, in Australia at least, a dietitian has to be a member of the DAA to be able to obtain a Medicare etc. practitioner's number that allows patients to claim rebates for their services. They hold that very big stick over the heads of their members to ensure they toe the party line. There's a very interesting twitter account "We Dietitians" that has some sobering tales of the goings on, e.g. the way the DAA behaved towards Jennifer Elliott:One does not require membership of a professional organization in order to practise. Accreditation results from the award of meeting the tertiary requirements. The association is no different to any other including unions. They all have the self interest of their members at heart. Every industry has them.
My understanding is that, in Australia at least, a dietitian has to be a member of the DAA to be able to obtain a Medicare etc. practitioner's number that allows patients to claim rebates for their services. They hold that very big stick over the heads of their members to ensure they toe the party line. There's a very interesting twitter account "We Dietitians" that has some sobering tales of the goings on, e.g. the way the DAA behaved towards Jennifer Elliott:
https://twitter.com/WeDietitians
Then there's the whole sorry saga of the DAA persecution of Gary Fettke. Makes for some very interesting reading.
Here we have the Heart and Stroke foundation that puts a check mark on “heart smart” foods.I feel sorry for those looking for a magic pill who don't research their condition and seek a more appropriate course than the one offered by the medical and nutrition bodies.
Here we have the Heart and Stroke foundation that puts a check mark on “heart smart” foods.
I causes people to just accept it with out researching if that product truly is good for ones heart.
Heart Smart doesn't consider diabetics. Can't see a 'Diabetic Smart' working too well either. It is a whole diet regimen rather than singular foods. On top of that, opposition from the illustrious all and powerful that apparently know better.Here we have the Heart and Stroke foundation that puts a check mark on “heart smart” foods.
I causes people to just accept it with out researching if that product truly is good for ones heart.
I agree.Heart Smart doesn't consider diabetics. Can't see a 'Diabetic Smart' working too well either. It is a whole diet regimen rather than singular foods. On top of that, opposition from the illustrious all and powerful that apparently know better.
I agree.
I know it doesn’t consider diabetics. But it does give people who don’t do their own research a false sense of security.
It has been said before on this forum that the members here are unusual in that they ask questions and try to find solutions to their health issues. And many times it’s goes against the HCP and what is considered popular opinion.
One question, am I right in thinking that anyone can call themselves a nutritionist
This nutritionist on the radio said that there was "... no scientific basis behind this diet".
In the UK, that is correct. However, I made sure that my nutritionist didn't just call herself a nutritionist, she has a BSc in Nutritional Medicine, is a member of The British Association of Nutritional Therapists and a qualified Complementary and Natural Healthcare Council Nutritional Therapist, She also has a BSc in Chemistry and an MBA. No slouch by any means and was 100% responsible for me following a low carb diet.
My opinion is that the diet is sustainable, especially as I can't go back to eating the approximately 250gms of carbohydrate a day without going back to taking additional medication to control BG.
I don't suppose you remember her name. It's interesting that her opinion is totally different to the opinion of my well qualified Nutritional Therapist. Makes you wonder, I'll have to mention it to her, in fact I'll send her an eMail.
I will ask him if he caught her name when he gets home this evening.
Cheers, it sounds like someone pontificating and waxing lyrical about something they have little or no actual knowledge of and certainly no empirical evidence. I'm pleased that Tom Watson has had success with the LCHF diet (he was putting butter in coffee, that's hard core LCHF LOL). Whether one MP in the commons is enough to change attitudes, who knows. I did see one quote that's something I've experienced. Basically you can't be racist, sexist, homophobic, but can say what you like to and about overweight people.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?