I agree with this explanation. The cutoff points are arbitrary but that doesn't make them meaningless. Whole committees of doctors would have deliberated on the best places to draw those lines.My understanding is that it is all just a sliding scale from the new born babe, with (hopefully) a perfect metabolism, to the 60 something drowning in sugar with an HbA1c in the 90's. The powers that be have simply picked on particular numbers for administrative purposes and given them names and decided what they will or will not do about it. Nothing in particular happens when a person crosses one of the divides, they just get put on a different treatment pathway.
Sally
My understanding is that it is all just a sliding scale from the new born babe, with (hopefully) a perfect metabolism, to the 60 something drowning in sugar with an HbA1c in the 90's. The powers that be have simply picked on particular numbers for administrative purposes and given them names and decided what they will or will not do about it. Nothing in particular happens when a person crosses one of the divides, they just get put on a different treatment pathway.
Sally
I visualised a couple of accountants, but then we're all different.Whole committees of doctors would have deliberated on the best places to draw those lines.
Don't forget the lawyers as well.I visualised a couple of accountants, but then we're all different.
Sally
Very true. T1 and T2 are rampant in my extended family. I have relatives who are quite overweight, and older than me, who don't even have prediabetes. Annoying, LOL. but then I remember that we never know what struggles other people have behind closed doors.My Mum has been a T2 for many many years. I've obviously inherited the genes ( thanks for that Mum ). Both her siblings are T2. My sister has been pre-diabetic for years but has no progressed. I suppose it depends upon our own individual physiology as to whether anyone eventually makes the transition.
Perhaps we need our own version of the song The 12 Days of Christmas.Don't forget the lawyers as well.
Reading another thread where there were the usual discussions of reversal/remission/control I realised that I don't know what it means to transition from pre-diabetic to diabetic. It is mostly accepted that, once you are diabetic you are always diabetic, you can control your BG to normal levels but you are not cured. I believe the implication of the term pre-diabetic is that if you take action at this point (which not many people do) you may not become diabetic. Is this cured, or no different from someone who was diabetic but is now controlled? Is there something that happens that results in a cliff edge transition to diabetic, maybe if you have lost function in 50% of your beta cells it is too late but 49% you can recover from? Does anybody know?
Yeah, poop does happen, I'm T2 but thankfully the rest of me is good except for a small amount neuropathy in my feet that doesn't really bother me much. Lucky I suppose that at 61 there's nothing else. Years ago now my wife and I lost our eldest child to cancer. Kind of puts a reality check and a bit of perspective on a T2 diagnosis. Some people are just way worse off than me. I'm thankful every day for that at least.Very true. T1 and T2 are rampant in my extended family. I have relatives who are quite overweight, and older than me, who don't even have prediabetes. Annoying, LOL. but then I remember that we never know what struggles other people have behind closed doors.
My Mum always looks a bit hurt when I thank her for the genes, so I've started thanking her mother instead, who isn't around to respond. **** happens in life, doesn't it?
Edited by moderator for language
One idea I have about this phenomenon is that since diabetes is such a relatively common disease, the odds of two people with the genetic predisposition for it marrying could be a bit higher than other possible combinations. I don't know.I'm always interested in the research that shows that you are more likely to become T2 if your husband/wife/partner is T2. There was something very recently about this, sorry can't remember where. The implication is that environment (I'm guessing food on the table, rather than air pollutants) is very much to blame. Relatives will, of course, usually have shared an environment or a food culture, so this muddies the water of the, "my mother was T2, so what chance did I have", argument.
Perhaps we inherit a pre-disposition, but our surroundings/culture is/are the cause.
Sally
I'm always interested in the research that shows that you are more likely to become T2 if your husband/wife/partner is T2. There was something very recently about this, sorry can't remember where. The implication is that environment (I'm guessing food on the table, rather than air pollutants) is very much to blame. Relatives will, of course, usually have shared an environment or a food culture, so this muddies the water of the, "my mother was T2, so what chance did I have", argument.
Perhaps we inherit a pre-disposition, but our surroundings/culture is/are the cause.
Sally
I find it odd that a person who can be very obese not have Diabetes or even Pre-Diabetes and have normal sugar levels. I suppose it goes to show that it is not just all about weight.
And some people with diabetes are so thin that they don't even cast a shadow if they turn side-on.I find it odd that a person who can be very obese not have Diabetes or even Pre-Diabetes and have normal sugar levels. I suppose it goes to show that it is not just all about weight.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?