Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 on low carb /cholesterol levels have increased
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jjraak" data-source="post: 2412149" data-attributes="member: 493719"><p>The two posts above..SPOT ON.</p><p></p><p>Have to wonder how long before the stain effect leaves a persons body, though ?</p><p></p><p>could it be the statins causing the rise, even after you stopped ?</p><p></p><p></p><p>If i could, i would liken T2D Treatment being from the past and using data far beyond it's use by date.</p><p></p><p>Most data is dominated by the historical.</p><p></p><p>and for diabetes that would have been before libre and deffo before LCHF/keto had such a following.</p><p></p><p>so back in the day, we all listened to doctors and did as we were told.</p><p>after all they studied for ages to be experts in a given field.</p><p></p><p>But the give away is in the field, aka General Practitioner. GP</p><p></p><p>how one earth could they update themselves on everything.</p><p></p><p></p><p>We however CAN, because it's personal, so we MAKE the time, </p><p></p><p>so all the stats are screwed because SO many followed the given advice , </p><p>because where else MIGHT they get the idea others ways MIGHT be better..mmhh.</p><p></p><p>WE now have the web..so the wisdom of crowds..(in my signature, well worth a watch )</p><p>comes to the fore, people save themselves and pass on the message, and others follow by observing how well those others did </p><p></p><p>YET that data has still to dilute the OLD, OLD, data sources</p><p></p><p>so while many have MUCH better Lipid panels..<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />D)</p><p>dogma says all T2D are the same . so must be treated accordingly.</p><p></p><p>we will get there eventually, but for now, far too many have to wrestle with the idea </p><p>of abandoning the structures they knew and trusted,</p><p>for a framework of support that MAKES good sense, </p><p>yet doesn't have the backing of the majority of the Medical establishment.</p><p></p><p>long story short.</p><p></p><p>Kids no longer sweep chimneys</p><p>because we've moved on.</p><p></p><p>Current T2D practice is too far weighted by the old ways.</p><p>we need more enlightened doctors like Dr Unwin, </p><p>a few more years and this idea T2D's naturally die early, of CVD will be outmoded.</p><p></p><p>As will the "you MUST have statins ASAP"</p><p></p><p>For now, we must endure & educate ourselves.</p><p></p><p>There is even some disagreement that lower cholesterol is even good for us.</p><p>and that many might benefit as they age from Cholesterol being higher, as it may have a protective factor.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jjraak, post: 2412149, member: 493719"] The two posts above..SPOT ON. Have to wonder how long before the stain effect leaves a persons body, though ? could it be the statins causing the rise, even after you stopped ? If i could, i would liken T2D Treatment being from the past and using data far beyond it's use by date. Most data is dominated by the historical. and for diabetes that would have been before libre and deffo before LCHF/keto had such a following. so back in the day, we all listened to doctors and did as we were told. after all they studied for ages to be experts in a given field. But the give away is in the field, aka General Practitioner. GP how one earth could they update themselves on everything. We however CAN, because it's personal, so we MAKE the time, so all the stats are screwed because SO many followed the given advice , because where else MIGHT they get the idea others ways MIGHT be better..mmhh. WE now have the web..so the wisdom of crowds..(in my signature, well worth a watch ) comes to the fore, people save themselves and pass on the message, and others follow by observing how well those others did YET that data has still to dilute the OLD, OLD, data sources so while many have MUCH better Lipid panels..(:D) dogma says all T2D are the same . so must be treated accordingly. we will get there eventually, but for now, far too many have to wrestle with the idea of abandoning the structures they knew and trusted, for a framework of support that MAKES good sense, yet doesn't have the backing of the majority of the Medical establishment. long story short. Kids no longer sweep chimneys because we've moved on. Current T2D practice is too far weighted by the old ways. we need more enlightened doctors like Dr Unwin, a few more years and this idea T2D's naturally die early, of CVD will be outmoded. As will the "you MUST have statins ASAP" For now, we must endure & educate ourselves. There is even some disagreement that lower cholesterol is even good for us. and that many might benefit as they age from Cholesterol being higher, as it may have a protective factor. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 on low carb /cholesterol levels have increased
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…