My husband has received a letter - a penalty charge notice for £124.15. He was diagnosed with type 1 in 1998 age 18, he doesn't remember ever being told about the card and doesn't remember ever having one.
He has spoken to the BSA this evening and they have said they can only check back 2 years and he hasn't had one in that time.
He went to the DR surgery and the receptionist and the practice nurse were very surprised at the letter.
He has now applied for a card but we really don't want to pay this fine! especially when the prescription was for test strips insulin and needles. I find it really hard to believe that they are unable to see that the prescription was for insulin - something only used for diabetes - and being diabetic means free prescriptions - and still send out a £100 fine and also charge him for the medication?? GRRRR.
Quoted my 1st post rather than typing it again....
UPDATE...
My husband applied for the card and has received it, interestingly the letter says they will send a reminder when it is due for renewal in 5 years.
He has spoken to the BSA numerous times....telling them he has never had one, has never been told he needs one, and even asking hypothetically if they can only check back 2 years whats to say he didnt get one 4 1/2 years ago and its just not showing on their system but they have now said no end of he needs to pay.
His GP has drawn a blank and can't / wont do anything ( when he went in to get the form the GP said hed look into it and see if there was anything he could do which is what we've been waiting for)
Ive copied the link for Mr Jamie Reed and will email him, Our time is running out - the deadline for payment is the 23rd feb - opinions please ... do we just need to suck it up and pay?
Quoted my 1st post rather than typing it again....
UPDATE...
My husband applied for the card and has received it, interestingly the letter says they will send a reminder when it is due for renewal in 5 years.
He has spoken to the BSA numerous times....telling them he has never had one, has never been told he needs one, and even asking hypothetically if they can only check back 2 years whats to say he didnt get one 4 1/2 years ago and its just not showing on their system but they have now said no end of he needs to pay.
His GP has drawn a blank and can't / wont do anything ( when he went in to get the form the GP said hed look into it and see if there was anything he could do which is what we've been waiting for)
Ive copied the link for Mr Jamie Reed and will email him, Our time is running out - the deadline for payment is the 23rd feb - opinions please ... do we just need to suck it up and pay?
Question - those of you that have been fined .
Have you changed your usual pharmacy or chemists ?
Changed your address or location ?
Then been fined ?
Hi all,
I have just received one in the post, for £124.15...needless to say I am not that happy about it. I was told by a lady on the phone a similar story to others here, you are entitled to free prescriptions but only if you have the medical exemption certificate. I have never been asked for one, and I have been diabetic since 1986 and with the NHS since 1992. The GP has never told me about one and as others have said the pharmacist has always just said "tick that box".
I was also told that the GP can back date it by 30 days, which considering my charge is for September is not that helpful as the letter is dated 24th November. I have never bucked the system knowingly, and would have preferred to receive a "warning" or "first offence" to resolve the issue, and be given the chance to back date it as required by the GP.
Agree that I should have read the prescription small print, but when it hasn't changed in so many years and there was sort of an implied waiver with no notice by GP, Pharmacist or the Business Services Authority it seems a bit rough.
I am going to write to my MP and the press I think. I will pay £1.00 now and depending on what happens will pay the rest in instalments, I'll think of it like a donation to a good cause anyway!! After all, in the grand scheme of things, £124.15 isn't a lot for the wonderful care I get at King's College Hospital and have had at Queen Mary's. Hopefully they will not back date any more, otherwise I will take it further!
The thing is, I had a certificate pre-2002, because I was told I needed it by someone when I left Uni, and I may have been lacksadaisical at renewing it, but I knew I needed to (and have done at least twice in the intervening years).What gets me is the people that were diagnosed pre 2002 - how are they being informed? Uts all well and good giving penalty charges but if you were diagnosed pre certificates what have they done to inform thos persons?
What gets me is the people that were diagnosed pre 2002 - how are they being informed? Uts all well and good giving penalty charges but if you were diagnosed pre certificates what have they done to inform thos persons?
I was diagnosed in 1965 so had my first certificate in the 1970'sWhat gets me is the people that were diagnosed pre 2002 - how are they being informed? Uts all well and good giving penalty charges but if you were diagnosed pre certificates what have they done to inform thos persons?
Hrom PATNNo my pharmacy remains the same but apparently there are random checks being undertaken so I guess I was just unlucky.
I cannot believe the number of people that are blaming others for their own mistakes.Why are lots of people being fined now?
Diabetes UK met with the NHS BSA to discuss this. We found out that the responsibility for checking exemption from paying prescriptions was transferred to the NHS BSA in 2014. This had previously been done locally and the NHS BSA are using a much more thorough system than previously. Unfortunately, this has resulted in lots of people who have had diabetes for a long time, without ever realising they needed a certificate, being issued with a fine.
Why should the surgery or pharmacist be responsible for your prescription?Although it is all of our responsibility to check information we are signing, I do feel that Diabetes UK would be wise to include informing all GP practices, and pharmacists of the new crackdown and involve them in highlighting the issue. Every time a Diabetic or other exemption condition is made, the Surgery could ask the patient whether they have the relevant exemption card/certificate and the dispensing chemist could ask to see the card or confirm that the patient has one. Instead of us all complaining about the unfairness of it all, we would be all wiser to try and assist each other in getting the relevant paperwork in order.
The best post in this thread, wish I could like it more than onceHrom PATN
I cannot believe the number of people that are blaming others for their own mistakes.
Look at the highlighted areas especially the declaration !!
Why should the surgery or pharmacist be responsible for your prescription?
If the pharmacist asks you and you say No does that mean he can refuse to issue the prescription until you have paid for it?
Get real, your prescription, your declaration, your signature - your responsibility !!
Although it is all of our responsibility to check what we are signing
Instead of us all complaining about the unfairness of it all, we would all be wiser to try and assist each other in getting the relevant paperwork in order
And if you haven't got the Exemption Certificate card you should be paying.If the pharmacist doesn't see evidence, it doesn't mean we have to then pay. You would still get prescription free as you signed saying you was a holder of a current exemption certificate. If you do not show certificate at time of collection, you still get meds but pharmacist would just sign to say evidence not seen.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?