Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 2 Diabetes
type 2 diabetes treatment from practice nurse only
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mpe" data-source="post: 406343" data-attributes="member: 60109"><p>Actually the non "sugary" ones may well be the worst. Because of a quirk of the chemistry involved disaccharides equate to 106% sugar and polysaccharides equate to 111% sugar.</p><p></p><p></p><p>If you are going to eat a high carbohydrate diet, from the point of view of blood glucose control, sucrose or lactose @53% glucose are a much better option than amylose or amylopectin @111% glucose. Most possible high carbohydrate diets would also be high in glucose diets. Even those which didn't have a specific class (of 1/3) for foods high in glucose polysaccharides.</p><p>The biggest irony is that humans don't need to eat any glucose, fructose or galactose. Any which the body cannot use in fairly short order get converted (saturated) fats anyway.</p><p>Many people also find it trivially easy to overeat on a high carbohydrate diet, but much harder on any diet where carbohydrates do not dominate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mpe, post: 406343, member: 60109"] Actually the non "sugary" ones may well be the worst. Because of a quirk of the chemistry involved disaccharides equate to 106% sugar and polysaccharides equate to 111% sugar. If you are going to eat a high carbohydrate diet, from the point of view of blood glucose control, sucrose or lactose @53% glucose are a much better option than amylose or amylopectin @111% glucose. Most possible high carbohydrate diets would also be high in glucose diets. Even those which didn't have a specific class (of 1/3) for foods high in glucose polysaccharides. The biggest irony is that humans don't need to eat any glucose, fructose or galactose. Any which the body cannot use in fairly short order get converted (saturated) fats anyway. Many people also find it trivially easy to overeat on a high carbohydrate diet, but much harder on any diet where carbohydrates do not dominate. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 2 Diabetes
type 2 diabetes treatment from practice nurse only
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…