Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 1 Diabetes
WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO HAVE NORMAL BLOOD SUGAR LEVELS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hanadr" data-source="post: 346776" data-attributes="member: 8110"><p><strong>Re: WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO HAVE NORMAL BLOOD SUAGR LEVELS</strong></p><p></p><p>AMBrennan</p><p> I don't pracice bad science, I know when something is a "link" or a cause. I hold by this. If low Hba1c in and of itself were dqngerous, non-diabetics would be at risk in the same way as diabetics.</p><p> If taking large dose of multiple medication is dangerous, it's likely to be more dangerous to those who indulge in it most.</p><p> No-one has looked at low HbA1cs kept low by diet and/or exercise.</p><p> I do know about Semmelweiss and how he was criticised for his belief that Puerperal fever was transmited on the hands of Doctors. I also realise that much of the prjudice against him was caused by his being Hungarian in Austria- Hungary,thus a member of the "Lower orders". </p><p> I also know how difficult it was for Doctor John Snow to get the authorities to admit that cholera was water borne.</p><p>there are dozens of ex\mples of where the medical profession has dismissed new ideas, based on evidence, because the person presenting that evidence was not one of their more highly regarded members. So what's changed there?Richard K. Bernstein is an MD and a Licensed practitioner in the USA. Why is the establishment against his EVIDENCE? </p><p>And WHY do so many people believe the 7 countries study on what constitutes a Healthy diet? Ancel Keys was not a nutritionist and he discarded at least 2/3 of the EVIDENCE he collected. </p><p> Evidence needs to be evaluated, corroborated, peer reviewed, understood. not just chosen at random.</p><p> Try the technique of "Reductio ad absurdam"</p><p> Hana</p><p> PS I think that despite much of his stuff being important, Lustig is mistaken about Glucose being a healthy carb.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hanadr, post: 346776, member: 8110"] [b]Re: WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO HAVE NORMAL BLOOD SUAGR LEVELS[/b] AMBrennan I don't pracice bad science, I know when something is a "link" or a cause. I hold by this. If low Hba1c in and of itself were dqngerous, non-diabetics would be at risk in the same way as diabetics. If taking large dose of multiple medication is dangerous, it's likely to be more dangerous to those who indulge in it most. No-one has looked at low HbA1cs kept low by diet and/or exercise. I do know about Semmelweiss and how he was criticised for his belief that Puerperal fever was transmited on the hands of Doctors. I also realise that much of the prjudice against him was caused by his being Hungarian in Austria- Hungary,thus a member of the "Lower orders". I also know how difficult it was for Doctor John Snow to get the authorities to admit that cholera was water borne. there are dozens of ex\mples of where the medical profession has dismissed new ideas, based on evidence, because the person presenting that evidence was not one of their more highly regarded members. So what's changed there?Richard K. Bernstein is an MD and a Licensed practitioner in the USA. Why is the establishment against his EVIDENCE? And WHY do so many people believe the 7 countries study on what constitutes a Healthy diet? Ancel Keys was not a nutritionist and he discarded at least 2/3 of the EVIDENCE he collected. Evidence needs to be evaluated, corroborated, peer reviewed, understood. not just chosen at random. Try the technique of "Reductio ad absurdam" Hana PS I think that despite much of his stuff being important, Lustig is mistaken about Glucose being a healthy carb. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 1 Diabetes
WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO HAVE NORMAL BLOOD SUGAR LEVELS
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…