The hba1c depends on your blood glucose throughout the whole day, over 8 to 12 weeks.Is it the number of carbs alone or also the number of times you eat that can affect your a1c negatively?
The hba1c depends on your blood glucose throughout the whole day, over 8 to 12 weeks.
So every time your blood sugar is higher, it will make the hba1c go up.
What about using a glucose meter to see when you're going high?
Reducing those highs will reduce your hba1c.
I can eat very low carb meals without my blood glucose going up, so this won't affect my hba1c, even if I ate 6 of those meals a day.
But eating a very high carb meal can make my BG stay high for hours, which does affect hba1c if it's a regular occurence.
When you do a finger prick test, that gives you a direct snapshot of where your blood sugars are now. Might be on the way up, the way down, or stable. The A1c test is different, and gives a picture of what your BG has been like for the past three months. it does this by using "the major glycated component of haemoglobin" attached to your red blood cells. That correlates pretty well with your average blood glucose over the past three months - because 90-120 days is about how long a red blood cell lives. About 50% of the A1c value comes from the last 30 days before A1c testing and only 10% from the first thirty days, so it's weighted towards more recent BG levels. It's not a perfect relationship - my finger prick testing averaged would predict an A1c of about 32, but my A1c is 36-38. Close enough for most purposes.Is it the number of carbs alone or also the number of times you eat that can affect your a1c negatively?
I think going omad is a bit extreme for me in the long run, but two (or three) meals would be ok. However, I need to get my a1c down a bit and willing to reduce my intake frequency if it lowers my sugar.
Can you help me with my question? Thanks in advance
Is it the number of carbs alone or also the number of times you eat that can affect your a1c negatively?
This suggests eating always creates a blood sugar spike.b. stop creating blood sugar spikes by eating too often
This suggests eating always creates a blood sugar spike.
For many, it doesn't, provided they ate very little carbs.
I agree with this I am a skinny type 2 and if I only had 2 or even 3 meals a day I would not even maintain my (under) weight but I am keeping my BG level stableThis suggests eating always creates a blood sugar spike.
For many, it doesn't, provided they ate very little carbs.
Also it depends how you define "spike". Non diabetics must have a rise in blood glucose in order to trigger insulin to control it.This suggests eating always creates a blood sugar spike.
For many, it doesn't, provided they ate very little carbs.
When eating carbs, yes. I don't need to inject insulin for no carb food, so I expect I didn't trigger an insulin response to no carb food before I got diabetes.Also it depends how you define "spike". Non diabetics must have a rise in blood glucose in order to trigger insulin to control it.
It's both.
If you wish to reduce your average blood sugar levels then
a. stop putting sugar into your body.. go as low carb as you can.
b. stop creating blood sugar spikes by eating too often
A bit of intermittent fasting combined with ultra low carb worked wonders for me and many others here.
Hi. Having an a1c of 36 what levels do you see on your meter 2 hrs after or fasting? XWhen you do a finger prick test, that gives you a direct snapshot of where your blood sugars are now. Might be on the way up, the way down, or stable. The A1c test is different, and gives a picture of what your BG has been like for the past three months. it does this by using "the major glycated component of haemoglobin" attached to your red blood cells. That correlates pretty well with your average blood glucose over the past three months - because 90-120 days is about how long a red blood cell lives. About 50% of the A1c value comes from the last 30 days before A1c testing and only 10% from the first thirty days, so it's weighted towards more recent BG levels. It's not a perfect relationship - my finger prick testing averaged would predict an A1c of about 32, but my A1c is 36-38. Close enough for most purposes.
The driver for lowering blood glucose (for me anyway) was lowering carbs. As long as I don't eat a lot of carbs (for me a lot is more than about 20-25g a day), the number of times I eat doesn't matter. I don't usually want to eat several meals, because what I am eating (meat, dairy etc) means that I'm never really hungry. Twelve hours between eating is normal and 18 isn't unusual for me. Not an effort, if you're not hungry.
Protein can still requires insulin - but this is delayed and lower requirement than for carbs.When eating carbs, yes. I don't need to inject insulin for no carb food, so I expect I didn't trigger an insulin response to no carb food before I got diabetes.
That figure depends on what I've eaten, when I ate it, the outside temperature (raises my BG), what physical work I've done (BG up and down, erratic), whether I'm ill or not (BG up), whether I've had any alcohol (BG drops like a stone) ....there are more. I eat around 20g carbs/day - some days much less. I'm normally in ketosis, running on ketones due to low intake of carbs. I estimate today (so far) about 5g carbs, yesterday about the same. Didn't eat at all until 7pm, just coffee until then, had done a bit of clearance work in the garden, and I did happen to test tonight - I don't usually these days unless I'm eating something new. Tonight was because I had only one strip left in the pot and it needed using.Hi. Having an a1c of 36 what levels do you see on your meter 2 hrs after or fasting? X
So essentially an a1c as good as yours - we don’t want to see anything over 6. Thanks. XThat figure depends on what I've eaten, when I ate it, the outside temperature (raises my BG), what physical work I've done (BG up and down, erratic), whether I'm ill or not (BG up), whether I've had any alcohol (BG drops like a stone) ....there are more. I eat around 20g carbs/day - some days much less. I'm normally in ketosis, running on ketones due to low intake of carbs. I estimate today (so far) about 5g carbs, yesterday about the same. Didn't eat at all until 7pm, just coffee until then, had done a bit of clearance work in the garden, and I did happen to test tonight - I don't usually these days unless I'm eating something new. Tonight was because I had only one strip left in the pot and it needed using.
That's the context for the reading I had of 5.0, which was unsurprising, and might have been anything from 4.3 to 5.3 on another day. I don't usually see a big rise in BG after eating, maybe 0.5 generally (from veg) or as much as 1.0 if I've had (eg) chickpeas in a curry. I don't want high levels - it's been a long time since I had a result above 6.0 - but I also don't want spikes.
Just as my reading depends on a huge number of factors, it will have no relation to yours, even if you did exactly the same things. You have to learn how your own system responds. I record my readings and keep notes of what I've eaten and any other relevant factors. It's really helpful.
No, I don't think you can assume that. You have to work out what your own BG responses to food, exercise, illness etc. are. My responses are little or no use to you. You're setting yourself a target and if that's what you want to do it needs to be based on how you respond, not how I respond.So essentially an a1c as good as yours - we don’t want to see anything over 6. Thanks. X
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?