RobsterinSheff
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 54
- Location
- Sheffield, South Yorkshire
- Dislikes
- Type 2 diabetes; Hashimotos; English weather; arrogant and self centered people
RobsterinSheff said:He said it was because the "target for T2D should be tightly controlled within the range 48 and 53" (6.5- 7.0 in old money): reason/ excuse being a so-called U-shape in the CvD 'endpoints (!) of diabetics that mean risk is raised both if you are above 53 and below 48!
A recent observational UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD) study has reported increased risk of total mortality with lower HbA1c with lowest risk for HbA1c 7.5%, and also a 49% higher risk of total mortality with insulin treatment versus oral agents. However, this was not verified in the NDR study, showing no J-shaped risk curve for total mortality in patients treated with insulin or oral agents, and that the increased risk of total mortality with insulin was due almost exclusively to an increased risk of non-CVD mortality, and that HbA1c was not at all associated with non-CVD mortality.
Ideal Targets for HbA1c
if well, and diet or tablet controlled HbA1c less than 6.5%
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?