- Messages
- 4,388
- Location
- Suffolk, UK
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
- Treatment type
- Tablets (oral)
- Dislikes
- Diet drinks - the artificial sweeteners taste vile.
Having to forswear foods I have loved all my life.
Trying to find low carb meals when eating out.
Definitely pseudoscience here. The fat does not magically dissolve into CO2 and H2O. There are two basic fat sumps in the body. Muscle cells and adipose tissue cells, The first stores glucose as glycogen and water, the second stores lipids and glucose / fructose converted to lipids. Weight loss diets normally only empties the muscle cell stores by converting the stored glycogen back to blood glucose and water for use as energy in the brain and muscles instead of dietary supplied glucose, thus the muscles get depleted of stored glucose and it gets burnt off as CO2 and H2O.https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=12013155
The article states that most people assume when losing weight that fat turns to energy. This is wrong because it turns to carbon dioxide and water. Say what?
To me this is like asking where petrol in the tank of your car goes. Energy? No, it just comes out of the exhaust as carbon dioxide and water.
My take is that it does turn to energy, with carbon dioxide and water as by products of the conversion. Therefore the assumption of the majority is correct.
Am I misreading this article or is this faux/weird science?
Briefly?So if fat is turned to water and carbon dioxide ,if I drink lots of water and inhale the fuel emissions I should put weight on!!!?
Carol
The car analogy does not work for me, Fuel be it food or petrol is stored energy that gets released when the fuel is used. The car would not go far if you had a tank of H2O and CO2 in it, would it? They do not mix very well, and are pretty inert. Petrol however is a good mix of the two and has potential for an explosion, which after all is what happens in the engine. By corollary, a diesel engine will actually work with chip fat so the analogy is not far fetched, This is one instance where reverse engineering falls down.Hi,
Oooh, a car analogy. (Alway get drawn in on one of those..)
Though to be fair, cars arn't always using the fuel from the tank at maximum capacity until the engine is up to running temp? So there maybe a little unburt fuel too...? The emission composition will also change as the engine increases temperature. Hence emission tests during an MOT should only be performed whilst the vehicle is at operating temperature & not before...
Enough about cars.. I'll tag in @bulkbiker
Short of surgery I don't think we can get rid of body fat any way other than breaking it down to produce energy, with as you say, CO2 and H2O as by-products. The energy comes from the chemical bonds in the molecules that are broken down. The following article explains everything that you might want to know about it, possibly a lot more.https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=12013155
The article states that most people assume when losing weight that fat turns to energy. This is wrong because it turns to carbon dioxide and water. Say what?
To me this is like asking where petrol in the tank of your car goes. Energy? No, it just comes out of the exhaust as carbon dioxide and water.
My take is that it does turn to energy, with carbon dioxide and water as by products of the conversion. Therefore the assumption of the majority is correct.
Am I misreading this article or is this faux/weird science?
Just taking this thread in a slight detour...... Recent reports into gastric banding with obese patients show many are left with rather a large muffin flap that has to be tucked in like a shirt. Patients are asking for reconstructive surgery on the NHS and are being refused at the moment. So adipose tissue fat reduction does have a downside after all, Not all is fat, and not all goes away like thatShort of surgery I don't think we can get rid of body fat any way other than breaking it down to produce energy, with as you say, CO2 and H2O as by-products. The energy comes from the chemical bonds in the molecules that are broken down. The following article explains everything that you might want to know about it, possibly a lot more.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK26882/
Just taking this thread in a slight detour...... Recent reports into gastric banding with obese patients show many are left with rather a large muffin flap that has to be tucked in like a shirt. Patients are asking for reconstructive surgery on the NHS and are being refused at the moment. So adipose tissue fat reduction does have a downside after all, Not all is fat, and not all goes away like that
Lets get back on piste.....
The oxygen inhaled is used to breakdown the fat molecules and other foodstuffs to release energy, CO2 and H2O by aerobic respiration. How do you weigh oxygen? Carefully!! Actually the figures were probably gained by theoretical calculations based on the proportions needed to carry out the reactions.Did someone call?
How do you weight oxygen? What does 600g of oxygen look like and why doesn't it get exhaled along with the other stuff?
Sounds like a load of guff (or maybe puff) to me...
But wasn't it the German MOT tune up that actually reduced emissions, aka Volkswagen und Audi?Just a slight detour, like an "Italian tune up" prior to dropping the motor down the MOT centre?
But I'm loving the discussion..
My oxygen bottle says it's litres per minute, I can get five litres a minute flat out or tune it up / down to three per minute for inhalation.How do you weigh oxygen? What does 600g of oxygen look like and why doesn't it get exhaled along with the other stuff?
But not basted on, surely that does not work......? Too much fun at Xmas perchance?I do not care about the mechanics I just want to find the fat to put on my skinny neck and chest ,bony elbows and legs
Carol
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?