Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Management
Blood Glucose Monitoring
Where to get HOMA-IR & c-peptide test in UK
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DCUKMod" data-source="post: 2212203" data-attributes="member: 345386"><p>Personally, in that circumstance, I would take the slip of paper, or whatever it is, and put it behind my own list in my hand, showing him, politely, discreetly, but unmistakably where you prioritise his action.</p><p></p><p>It's your appointment. You need to develop strategies, and where necessary challenge his strategies for rationale.</p><p></p><p>At my recent mega appointment, the Endo wanted to defer action until a bone scan was done, which would take "a few weeks". I asked if he expected to see a worrying outcome from the scan. Answer: "No". I then asked what rate of degradation of bone density was usually exhibited on the proposed deferred meds. Answer: "Very slow". So my response was, "what exactly is the clinically material and significant impact of deferring prescribing? What material harm could be done in 6-8 weeks?" His answer: "None".</p><p></p><p>I then looked him in the eye and asked what advantage there was, to <em><strong>me</strong></em>, in deferring prescribing. He gave in.</p><p></p><p>i usually come out of these meetings tired. But it's important. A 4 minute consultation isn't a consultation in my view, never mind covering multiple topics.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DCUKMod, post: 2212203, member: 345386"] Personally, in that circumstance, I would take the slip of paper, or whatever it is, and put it behind my own list in my hand, showing him, politely, discreetly, but unmistakably where you prioritise his action. It's your appointment. You need to develop strategies, and where necessary challenge his strategies for rationale. At my recent mega appointment, the Endo wanted to defer action until a bone scan was done, which would take "a few weeks". I asked if he expected to see a worrying outcome from the scan. Answer: "No". I then asked what rate of degradation of bone density was usually exhibited on the proposed deferred meds. Answer: "Very slow". So my response was, "what exactly is the clinically material and significant impact of deferring prescribing? What material harm could be done in 6-8 weeks?" His answer: "None". I then looked him in the eye and asked what advantage there was, to [I][B]me[/B][/I], in deferring prescribing. He gave in. i usually come out of these meetings tired. But it's important. A 4 minute consultation isn't a consultation in my view, never mind covering multiple topics. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Management
Blood Glucose Monitoring
Where to get HOMA-IR & c-peptide test in UK
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…