Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Soapbox - Have Your Say
Who are you voting for in the general election 2017?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="maglil55" data-source="post: 1478582" data-attributes="member: 52911"><p>Zand- it makes sense to most people when it is explained clearly without the spin for political gain. We get it constantly and yet I have only seen one article that explains it clearly and accurately. Ruth Davidson has tried to explain it but she gets shouted down for supporting the "abhorrent rape clause". What I don't get is what is abhorrent about allowing Benefit to be claimed for a child conceived in exceptional circumstances? </p><p>I cannot believe that I am the only one who has taken the trouble to look at the legislation, the forms, the Guidance and the manifestos and pulled out the facts. As I said the media has a lot to answer for.</p><p>PS The election leaflet I received from my local SNP MP consisted of non stop sound bites about "Tories" in various guises and yes the "Tory rape clause" was in it too along with "hard brexit" and "extreme brexit" numerous times. I want a local MP who lives here and is prepared to work for the good of the community rather than spouting inaccurate abuse.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="maglil55, post: 1478582, member: 52911"] Zand- it makes sense to most people when it is explained clearly without the spin for political gain. We get it constantly and yet I have only seen one article that explains it clearly and accurately. Ruth Davidson has tried to explain it but she gets shouted down for supporting the "abhorrent rape clause". What I don't get is what is abhorrent about allowing Benefit to be claimed for a child conceived in exceptional circumstances? I cannot believe that I am the only one who has taken the trouble to look at the legislation, the forms, the Guidance and the manifestos and pulled out the facts. As I said the media has a lot to answer for. PS The election leaflet I received from my local SNP MP consisted of non stop sound bites about "Tories" in various guises and yes the "Tory rape clause" was in it too along with "hard brexit" and "extreme brexit" numerous times. I want a local MP who lives here and is prepared to work for the good of the community rather than spouting inaccurate abuse. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Soapbox - Have Your Say
Who are you voting for in the general election 2017?
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…