Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Food, Nutrition and Recipes
Your thoughts on fructose
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oldvatr" data-source="post: 2465438" data-attributes="member: 196898"><p>Food product Ingredients listing tends to be given in order, High contribution >>> low contribution, so if it is in the front of the list then it is significant, but if towards the end of the listing then it will be trace amounts. Either way, it is unlikely to be a major problem in granola. As stated above, the low carb label should imply it is a small amount anyway, and NAFLD has other causes too, so I would not think of this item as being evil. But Granola may not be a good ingredient in a keto diet anyway, it still has significnt carbs (percentage wise)</p><p></p><p>I would query the GP using a blood test to diaagnose NAFLD, since I believe it is actually undetectable from blood tests, and requires a scan or biopsy for diagnosis. I presume it is the ALT figure he is worrying over.</p><p><a href="https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/liver-disease/nafld-nash/diagnosis" target="_blank">https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/liver-disease/nafld-nash/diagnosis</a></p><p>A genetic disposition to hyperdislipodemia (family cholesterol history) is a risk factor as is diabetes, but at the level being stated (prediabetes) then this can be discounted, and also obesity does not seem to be present either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oldvatr, post: 2465438, member: 196898"] Food product Ingredients listing tends to be given in order, High contribution >>> low contribution, so if it is in the front of the list then it is significant, but if towards the end of the listing then it will be trace amounts. Either way, it is unlikely to be a major problem in granola. As stated above, the low carb label should imply it is a small amount anyway, and NAFLD has other causes too, so I would not think of this item as being evil. But Granola may not be a good ingredient in a keto diet anyway, it still has significnt carbs (percentage wise) I would query the GP using a blood test to diaagnose NAFLD, since I believe it is actually undetectable from blood tests, and requires a scan or biopsy for diagnosis. I presume it is the ALT figure he is worrying over. [URL]https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/liver-disease/nafld-nash/diagnosis[/URL] A genetic disposition to hyperdislipodemia (family cholesterol history) is a risk factor as is diabetes, but at the level being stated (prediabetes) then this can be discounted, and also obesity does not seem to be present either. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Food, Nutrition and Recipes
Your thoughts on fructose
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…