- Messages
- 612
I've seen a lot of people talk about this as well as advocate it. There seem to be two arguments:
1. meat and animal products contain enough to effectively render eating veg superfluous
2. plant food is actively bad for you or at the very least much less efficient a source of said nutrition.
I have yet to find anything to support this, but I am intrigued from the persepctive of finding out just how much nutrition is in meat - not even necessarily organ meats as many ZC enthusiasts claim to eat just plain muscle meat. Given that supplementation seems to be required (at least according to the consensus) for LCHF/keto (specifically electrolytes) I am curious to know just how true this is because having to buy Mg supplements isn't cheap and losalt is filled with additives.
However I should add that nothing i've seen from web searching meat nutrition listings tells me that, unless you eat several kilos of meat a day, you'll get enough.
1. meat and animal products contain enough to effectively render eating veg superfluous
2. plant food is actively bad for you or at the very least much less efficient a source of said nutrition.
I have yet to find anything to support this, but I am intrigued from the persepctive of finding out just how much nutrition is in meat - not even necessarily organ meats as many ZC enthusiasts claim to eat just plain muscle meat. Given that supplementation seems to be required (at least according to the consensus) for LCHF/keto (specifically electrolytes) I am curious to know just how true this is because having to buy Mg supplements isn't cheap and losalt is filled with additives.
However I should add that nothing i've seen from web searching meat nutrition listings tells me that, unless you eat several kilos of meat a day, you'll get enough.