- Messages
- 17
- Type of diabetes
- Treatment type
- Tablets (oral)
- Dislikes
- Negativity
... but better than the alternative. Back in September of this year I clocked in at an 11.3 A1c. Obviously something had to change, and it did. I started Metformin and Jardiance and a low-carb diet. I also started using a CGM, mostly to keep a close eye on my numbers after eating certain foods and to keep tabs on how well the meds were working.
I am using mg/dl instead of mmol. Throughout this last 3 month period, my EAG has been running 115-120 mg/dl on average. After the 3 months, my A1c came in at 6.4. Certainly better than it was in September, which I am grateful for but it doesn't seem to match what I was seeing on the CGM (E.g a 120 EAG is 5.8 A1c). I have also been using finger sticks to verify the CGM. The finger stick numbers often come in much lower than the CGM, I understand they are two different sources for the levels, finger sticks are close to real-time and the CGM is using subcutaneous fluid so it is a "delayed" number unless I am just misunderstanding things completely.
Either way, was curious if anybody had experienced anything similar.
I am using mg/dl instead of mmol. Throughout this last 3 month period, my EAG has been running 115-120 mg/dl on average. After the 3 months, my A1c came in at 6.4. Certainly better than it was in September, which I am grateful for but it doesn't seem to match what I was seeing on the CGM (E.g a 120 EAG is 5.8 A1c). I have also been using finger sticks to verify the CGM. The finger stick numbers often come in much lower than the CGM, I understand they are two different sources for the levels, finger sticks are close to real-time and the CGM is using subcutaneous fluid so it is a "delayed" number unless I am just misunderstanding things completely.
Either way, was curious if anybody had experienced anything similar.