It's a good question, slip. It would be interesting to have a provider's take on it.
I don't think an AGP graph overloads with information. On the contrary, it provides in a single picture what an a1c provides but with much more detail at a glance about how the a1c is arrived at. It's a summary on steroids. Yet, it's still relatively new, so will take time to settle in
I've found the AGP and dailies I get from libre incredibly useful, much more so than strips and hba1c. So, I took printouts to the two meetings I've had since getting libre'd nine months ago.
One was with my GP, routine yearly checkup, she was interested but it was apparent that she didn't really know much about how to read them, especially not the AGP.
The other was a routine check up at the hospital diabetes clinic. Usually, those are 10 minute jobs, "how are you doing, any bad hypos, your a1's ok", that sort of thing. This one though, was different. The doctor was relatively newly qualified and wanting to specialise in diabetes. The meeting lasted a full thirty minutes, three times longer than usual, and a substantial part of that was us pouring over the AGP and then drilling down to a few of the dailies to figure out what, when and why bits and pieces were happening. She seemed genuinely interested in it.
But, the rub is, in both those instances, there was always other people in the waiting room after me waiting to be seen. Did she get a row from the boss for spending thirty minutes going over an AGP etc. when the usual is a quick look at a1c, and then next please?
AGP graphs have been around for a while now (haven't dexcom/medtronic been using them for a while?), but I get the sense that libre has kind of extended the number of users so that people are more likely now to be turning up at consultations waving this sort of stuff around.
I reckon that front-line staff do know already about how to read graphs, but as it's still a relatively new thing, the high heid yins are probably telling them, we use a1c, AGP needs to be proved, so carry on as you are. That will change.