Phew! At first glance I thought you wrote 'people have to lose 85% of their weight at diagnosis'. I would be left with just my head on a stick lolThere is nothing specout 800 cal or losing the weight quickly apart from it makes the experiment easier for him to manage. The key seems to lose the fat from the pancreas and he thinks people need to get to about 85% of their weight at the time they got Type2.
Remember that once the liver is empty of stored glucose you can eat most things once without peaking your BG, so it is hard to tell even with a BG meter that you are there.
800 cal a day will work for anyone to lose weight, a "normal" cal controlled diet does not work for lots of people with insulin resistance hence most of us use low carb and/or intermittent fasting.
I don't know whether it means exactly 800 cals for exactly 8 weeks or if it means low cal enough and long enough to lose 10% of your weight. Or indeed some other percentage. Obviously the objective is to lose all the fat off your liver and then all the fat off your pancreas, but how do you tell when you have done that, given that your BG will start to improve in 7 days with just the initial loss of some of the liver fat? We haven't got MRI scanners so we need guidlines.
Real shame he has not done research on LCHF etc as he is the one person that uk GPs may listen to.
Hope this link works. Its actually quite a longish video but I think really informative.
I had this exact question and even started a thread for opinions, but I since came across this video. The liver responds very quicly to the diet but the pancreas takes longer. Straight from the horses mouth as they say.
BGs plummeting already but weight not shifting much.
Thanks for posting, it was very useful. I have had some success with the very low calorie diet but I'm intrigued by the "reversal" thing. My opinion has always been that diabetes can only be called reversed if you can eat the 250 gms of carbs recommended for non diabetics. Professor Taylor implies that by suggesting that if you were eating 1 lb of potato before, you'd have to eat 25% after. That wouldn't be a struggle for me because I've sort of got to it in stages, reducing calories over the years from 2300 (my BMR) to 1800, then down to 1200 by cutting carbs and not replacing with fats.
Nice to put a face to a name, he seems quite human. LOL
But I don't want to detract from the work - because it is very, very impressive to be able to 'reverse' a group of patients within 8 weeks (the last figs I saw were that 40% remained 'reversed' at 6 months, in the second trial - that was from an interim presentation from the 2nd study).
There are a few of his video presentations and progress lectures on you tube if you do a search, showing his work going over the last few years, and showing the success rates of the 'reversal'.
From watching those, he seems to rate 'reversed' as having a non-D HbA1c.
Of course, that fits right in with the whole NHS orthodox mindset, but for my somewhat pedantic turn of mind, I would like to see some data on spikes after carbs, fasting rates and levels of insulin resistance.
But I don't want to detract from the work - because it is very, very impressive to be able to 'reverse' a group of patients within 8 weeks (the last figs I saw were that 40% remained 'reversed' at 6 months, in the second trial - that was from an interim presentation from the 2nd study).
And finding out if this can be rolled out across the land via surgeries and diabetic nurses could transform 1000s of lives.
So I hope the man and his team get the recognition he deserves!
Thank you very much for posting this Peerless. I am going to try it. In fact I have already started -Thurs Fri Sat. BGs plummeting already but weight not shifting much. but then what can you expect in 3 days? I am using real food and probably about 950 cals per day. Endlessly grating carrot!
I think that should wait until we have a bit more evidence. I would say that from my reading on these forums a lot more people have had success with LCHF than with the Newcastle Diet. I also find the lack of published follow up after a few years (the first study was done in 2011 after all) a bit concerning. I fear the results may not be as good as many would like to believe. I may just be being overly cynical but hey that's what science is all about isn't it.I hope they give Roy Taylor a knighthood. He deserves it after all he has done for T2s and saving the NHS all this money for treatment
lol Don't forget that many of the first low carbers here were banned and this delayed the LCHF message for a few years here.If anyone is deserving of knighthoods then I would nominate @Administrator for providing us with this amazing forum where I for one (and one of many) have turned my life and health around due to advice and support from other forum members who have walked the path already.