- Messages
- 678
- Type of diabetes
- Type 1
- Treatment type
- Insulin
I can see why the pumps get all of the attention - we need insulin to live.. I get that..
What i also understand is that all of the negative long term effects come from high glucose levels. Most pumps cant tell you what your sugars are doing so you still have to test manually, and its very easy to miss spikes or forget to check and run high for long periods. Pumps over amazing ability to delivery precise (and tiny) doses whenever requested, but without constant monitoring of glucose levels the user is not informed enough to make such changes. Even with a pump you can set your basal rate wrong, you can bolus wrong, and you can go low without knowing, all just like without a pump at all...
But with a CGM the patient would always be aware of their sugars can then adjust insulin appropriately.
Through my experience as a T1D (which is only about 8 months now) i find finger picks worse then injections, and carrying around a meter, strips and a lancet everywhere more of a hassle then an insulin pen and a couple needles.
If someone gave me a choice today, between a free pump, and a free CGM I would easily take the CGM - that way i would KNOW what my body is doing all time and act accordingly, but with a pump i would have the power to act but wouldn't always know what my body is doing all of the time.. which doesn't seem as beneficial.
Why is it that most insurance companies cover pump supplies, but seem to completely ignore the CGMs ?
What do you guys think on this topic?
(obv, the best situation is to have both)
What i also understand is that all of the negative long term effects come from high glucose levels. Most pumps cant tell you what your sugars are doing so you still have to test manually, and its very easy to miss spikes or forget to check and run high for long periods. Pumps over amazing ability to delivery precise (and tiny) doses whenever requested, but without constant monitoring of glucose levels the user is not informed enough to make such changes. Even with a pump you can set your basal rate wrong, you can bolus wrong, and you can go low without knowing, all just like without a pump at all...
But with a CGM the patient would always be aware of their sugars can then adjust insulin appropriately.
Through my experience as a T1D (which is only about 8 months now) i find finger picks worse then injections, and carrying around a meter, strips and a lancet everywhere more of a hassle then an insulin pen and a couple needles.
If someone gave me a choice today, between a free pump, and a free CGM I would easily take the CGM - that way i would KNOW what my body is doing all time and act accordingly, but with a pump i would have the power to act but wouldn't always know what my body is doing all of the time.. which doesn't seem as beneficial.
Why is it that most insurance companies cover pump supplies, but seem to completely ignore the CGMs ?
What do you guys think on this topic?
(obv, the best situation is to have both)