I live in Gloucestershire and have had the same thing happen to me, the excuse being that the test strips are much cheaper. I have been given the Glucolab monitor and so has my friend but my sister who also lives in Gloucestershire has been given a different monitor. My friend and I couldn't get on with our new meters at first as we were getting quite a few error messages, the main one being that it was a wet or used test strip when it had come straight out of the closed tub. This defeated the object somewhat as we were using twice as many strips. Things have settled down now and we are both sure that it was a faulty batch of strips rather than us not testing properly. The meter I had been using before was an Accuchek Aviva Nano, a tiny little meter that fitted discreetly in my hand and had test strips that had a large square to place blood. The Glucolab meter is larger and uses strips that have a tiny little place to put the blood. The blurb brags that you only need a very small spot of blood to get a reading but that's not a lot of help if you're hypo and your hands are shaking and you can't get it in the precise place. If you don't get the blood on the spot correctly you get an error message, usually that theres not enough blood. I was only given the one Glucolab meter which I use at home and keep the Accuchek meter in my handbag but I buy the test strips for that from the chemist They cost about £6.80 for 10 which I don't mind buying because I don't use them very often so they last a while and the other thing is that I have got another meter to fall back on if the Glucolab one goes wrong. I agree that I think once many thousands of people are using the same meters that the price will go up and the other thing is, what if there's a problem with the test strips? There have been recalls on faulty test strips and a warning a couple of years ago about counterfeit strips so who's to say that thousands of people won't be left without strips if something goes wrong again? It seems a good idea for the NHS to try and save some money but it could be a recipe for disaster if something goes wrong or the factory burns down, then what happens? The NHS would save more money if they stopped paying chemists a fee for every "free" consultion they do. According to a newspaper report, every time a person goes in for a consulation on their medication the chemist receives £28 - that's £70million a year!