Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
160g a day : the xyzzy/Grazer hypothesis
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="phoenix" data-source="post: 282727" data-attributes="member: 12578"><p>I've just sent Stephen the link to this paper about nutrient fates in normal (non diabetic, non obese men) It is a review by one of the researchers who did the overfeeding study he described and which lead to this discussion (I think!)</p><p><a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=%2FPNS%2FPNS54_01%2FS0029665195000243a.pdf&code=b4c6f76ec880e766e5fb4dfe7e2a40f0" target="_blank">http://journals.cambridge.org/download. ... fe7e2a40f0</a></p><p> </p><p>It was only after massive overfeeding over several days that glycogen stores were filled and new fat (de novo lipogenesis ) was created. Some pretty high intakes of carbs failed to do this.</p><p></p><p>ie some new fat was formed but the same amount was also burned, so no gain of new fat.</p><p>However, these were young fit men.</p><p> We haven't considered the fate of fats/proteins and the interaction of the different nutrients and the effect of insulin deficieny or resistance.</p><p>Complicated :lol:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="phoenix, post: 282727, member: 12578"] I've just sent Stephen the link to this paper about nutrient fates in normal (non diabetic, non obese men) It is a review by one of the researchers who did the overfeeding study he described and which lead to this discussion (I think!) [url=http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=%2FPNS%2FPNS54_01%2FS0029665195000243a.pdf&code=b4c6f76ec880e766e5fb4dfe7e2a40f0]http://journals.cambridge.org/download. ... fe7e2a40f0[/url] It was only after massive overfeeding over several days that glycogen stores were filled and new fat (de novo lipogenesis ) was created. Some pretty high intakes of carbs failed to do this. ie some new fat was formed but the same amount was also burned, so no gain of new fat. However, these were young fit men. We haven't considered the fate of fats/proteins and the interaction of the different nutrients and the effect of insulin deficieny or resistance. Complicated :lol: [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
160g a day : the xyzzy/Grazer hypothesis
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…