A
I don't eat beans, nuts, dark green leafy veggies, citrus fruits or low fat yogurt. So where does that leave me?
I reaaaaaaaaaally don't think that's how peer review works.Dr Bernstein who was an engineer only became a doctor because the medical world would not publish his papers on the LCHF diet so once quailified as an MD he was able to publish them himself and open his diabetic clinic in New York and presumably has made a fortune
It was purely an observation Paul but you see it as you want to it makes no differenceAbsolutely! Dr Bernstein was a kingpin in the development of self testing BG levels and inspirational to many... I just see this topic as being started as a cheap dig from the OP to be honest!
Yes I agree with you there a lot of people could see the high fat bit as having to eat loads of saturated meat fats so it could put them off of even lowering their carbs, Perhaps it would be better just to call it the LC dietI think one of the problems with Dr Bernstein's diet is that it is referred to as LCHF and the HF bit would scare many HCPs who have been trained to think fats are bad. I've noticed a big increase in references to LCHF and Dr Bernstein in recent months on the forum and to some extent it's counter-productive in our battle to get the carbs down. The low-carb bit is to be applauded but the HF bit is unnecessary as you only need enough fats and proteins to provide the calories and other essential nutrients.
This came from Dr Bernsteins biographyI reaaaaaaaaaally don't think that's how peer review works.
My point was that I think a background in operational research would be more useful for getting your paper published than learning about human anatomy.This came from Dr Bernsteins biography
This came from Dr Bernsteins biography
Bunneria you have certainly got it wrong. I was just interested in what the US diabetes guidelines were in comparison to our and merely quoted what was in Dr Bernsteins biographyIsn't it amazing how people can read the same thing and come away with completely different understandings?
When I read Bernstein's book, the things I noticed were how he had pioneered a diet and lifestyle which allowed him to halt the development of severe complications - caused by following the medical advice he was given (based on the standard diabetic treatment of the time). In time, following his very low carb approach, his body has healed most, but not all, of those complications.
The term low carb high fat did not start with Bernstein. It has emerged very recently. I've no idea if Bernstein even uses the term, so linking it to him is a misrepresentation - unless you can clearly find the term used in his older works?
I agree that Bernstein's diet is very low carb - far lower than I would want to maintain for long. But my preferences to not affect whether that diet works, or not.
But I am amazed at your last paragraph @AnnieC .
The implication is that you would rather Bernstein had stayed ill, continued to suffer complications, failed in his career choice, been a financial failure, and not helped fellow diabetics improve their blood glucose control - because you think he should have blindly followed a diet plan after he had LCHF dietestablished it was causing his complications.
I hope I am wrong in my reading of your post, because it appears to be deliberately inflammatory.
Perhaps you could clarify?
Why are you so interested though "AnnieC" ? You don't want to follow a LCHF diet and you're very vocal about that- so what's your angle??
Isn't it amazing how people can read the same thing and come away with completely different understandings?
When I read Bernstein's book, the things I noticed were how he had pioneered a diet and lifestyle which allowed him to halt the development of severe complications - caused by following the medical advice he was given (based on the standard diabetic treatment of the time). In time, following his very low carb approach, his body has healed most, but not all, of those complications.
The term low carb high fat did not start with Bernstein. It has emerged very recently. I've no idea if Bernstein even uses the term, so linking it to him is a misrepresentation - unless you can clearly find the term used in his older works?
I agree that Bernstein's diet is very low carb - far lower than I would want to maintain for long. But my preferences to not affect whether that diet works, or not.
But I am amazed at your last paragraph @AnnieC .
The implication is that you would rather Bernstein had stayed ill, continued to suffer complications, failed in his career choice, been a financial failure, and not helped fellow diabetics improve their blood glucose control - because you think he should have blindly followed a diet plan after he had established it was causing his complications.
I hope I am wrong in my reading of your post, because it appears to be deliberately inflammatory.
Perhaps you could clarify?
Yes I agree with you there a lot of people could see the high fat bit as having to eat loads of saturated meat fats so it could put them off of even lowering their carbs, Perhaps it would be better just to call it the LC diet
… and presumably has made a fortune.I was suprised to find he was T1 I had assumed he was T2 as there seems to be more T2's who follow the LCHF diet
Why are you so interested though "AnnieC" ? You don't want to follow a LCHF diet and you're very vocal about that- so what's your angle??
I do lower carbs and have some HF but we all have to adapt it to suit ourselves as I am sure you do PaulWhy are you so interested though "AnnieC" ? You don't want to follow a LCHF diet and you're very vocal about that- so what's your angle??
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?