http://www.express.co.uk/life-style...good-for-you-eat-up-says-new-dietary-research
basically good fat = natural fats including saturated fat
bad fats = man -made concoctions
about time too!
This article was reviewed last night by both SKY and BBC TV and in both cases it was panned by the 'reviewers'
Did the article itself state who published the study or carried it out? That would be far more useful than a multimedia circus act.
EDIT: The study, published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,
Dr Simon Dankel, associate professor at the University of Bergen in Norway, which carried out the study,
But same paper also reports this:
http://www.express.co.uk/life-style...g-ovarian-tumour-protein-spread-high-fat-diet
There was a study done earlier this year into sat v nonsat fats in terms of overall mortality, and it reported that sat fats are better for us. So Butter and natural cheeses got the thumbs up.More on the cancer research site.
https://www.worldwidecancerresearch...rchers-discover-new-cancer-spreading-protein/
It would have been interesting to run the high fat/low fat comparison with a third group of non-saturated fats only.
There was a study done earlier this year into sat v nonsat fats in terms of overall mortality, and it reported that sat fats are better for us. So Butter and natural cheeses got the thumbs up.
However, it seems that monosaturated are still better than poly saturated fats so meat fat did not come out quite as sweet smelling. Transfats still remain in the doghouse and are condemmed by all except the food industry. I personally do not have a problem with transfats just as long as they lubricate my machinery, not my body!
This may explain why Mediterranean diet is favoured in the media, but LCHF is not, Atkins also gets panned for their recommendations about meat use, especially with Akins#1.
More on the cancer research site.
https://www.worldwidecancerresearch...rchers-discover-new-cancer-spreading-protein/
It would have been interesting to run the high fat/low fat comparison with a third group of non-saturated fats only.
I would be interested to see the results if it was high saturated fats only, I;m becoming less and less convinced that somehow non saturated fats are better for you than saturated ones.
I am not a scientist but a quick search in wiki revealed this :
"Excess carbohydrates in the body are converted to palmitic acid." Palmitic acid is the first fatty acid produced during fatty acid synthesis and the precursor to longer fatty acids. As a consequence, palmitic acid is a major body component of animals. In humans, one analysis found it to comprise 21–30% (molar) of human depot fat,[12] and it is a major, but highly variable, lipid component of human breast milk.["
Given the amount of palmitic acid in the body including human breast milk and that the way to reduce it being in excess in one's body would appear to be to eat less carbs, I am not sure I see the point of this particular research . I wonder who paid for it.
I am not so sure why isolating palmitic acid found naturally in most thing, actually goes anyway to confirming that a "high fat" diet increases cancer in the circumstances, as opposed to a high carb diet that promotes the conversion of excess carbs into the same stuff within the body.
Far too many things affect overall mortality for it to be a meaningful marker really.
I will be sticking to the mediterranean diet, and avoiding saturated fats for the foreseeable future I think, and will be watching the research on the cancer link.
Do folk still read it?Shame it's in The Express. I've read behind the news, Mark Hyman MD for example.
So long as you enjoy it, I wouldn't worry about it then.
I'm taking the line, I'm not a scientist either, but I would assume they are though, and as I don't normally eat saturated fats, or excess carbs, it's simply a bonus for me.
(As to Professor Salvador Aznar Benitah, he was funded for most of his cancer research this decade by the AICR, so probably no bogeyman under the bed for this one either to be fair to him)
Do folk still read it?
This was published this year I believeWhilst I am sure the professor and the charity are acting entirely appropriately, the very fact that these days its actually for all practica purposes to even conduct a study which could look at the difference between a high saturated fat diet and any other is actually considered to be "unethical" because of the unquantified "risk" to the high saturated fat participants despite a complete paucity of actual statistically valid evidence that it is, means that the research needed to confirm that saturated fats are not the problem is unlikely to be done.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?