I had to rush and test again. Phew, it was 6.9 that was 3 and half hours.You’re probably getting ‘the pizza effect’, the high fat content of pizza may well have delayed the highest spike. Testing at the 3 hour mark might be a whole different story?
Love the way you write Jim. Succinct and clear and informative and refreshingly honest. My fasting blood glucose has been consistently in the 4s with the occasional low 5 for all of February. I have my 1st ever follow-up appointment and repeat bloods in a couple of weeks. This was a daunting prospect when I was first diagnosed but I'm quite looking forward to it now. Low carb (VERY low carb) high fat seems to be working for me, the only thing I miss being a crispy roast spud on a Sunday, and I've become a little evangelical about this way of eating TBH. Such an easy way to improve your health whether you have diabetes or not. Peace and love to you and I hope you have a beautiful day xIn my opinion, moment-to-moment, or meal-to-meal blood glucose concentration is not the best marker of control in type 2 diabetes. It will go up and down like the waves of the ocean (as you are seeing), but it doesn’t really tell you the level of the tide, and it definitely doesn’t tell you what is happening to your insulin profile. A better measure of monitoring your overall metabolic health - the long game as I call it - is your fasting glucose in the morning. It’s a more meaningful gauge of where you are in the spectrum of insulin resistance, which is what one should want to know if attempting to reverse metablic dysfunction as opposed to managing blood glucose from one meal to the next. The latter only tells you how much of a glucose load you are currently putting into your body, or by how much you are “topping up”.
This is of course a personal choice, and I’m merely making the distinction between the two approaches. Some may disagree, but this mindset has worked miracles for me personally, and is based on endless research and self-experimentation. Others may find a different path works for them, or indeed they may not be searching for a path, and would rather manage the condition day-to-day. That’s fine too, but expect to see blood glucose results like this, pretty much forever.
I always have a purpose for testing.
It may be to work out if I need to make any adjustments to my medication, it may be to decide whether to avoid a food type in the future, it may be to understand the impact exercise has on my BG so I can account for it in the future, it may be to track my progress.
My understanding is the reason for testing 2 (or 3 or ...) hours after a meal is for the second reason (to decide whether to avoid a food type in the future) whereas the testing @Jim Lahey mentions (fasting testing) is for the latter reason (to track progress).
There are reasons and times for all types of testing. But we may start to pull back on some reasons as we become more experienced with our diabetes.
I have type 1 diabetes but I think this is relevant for all.
Love the way you write Jim. Succinct and clear and informative and refreshingly honest. My fasting blood glucose has been consistently in the 4s with the occasional low 5 for all of February. I have my 1st ever follow-up appointment and repeat bloods in a couple of weeks. This was a daunting prospect when I was first diagnosed but I'm quite looking forward to it now. Low carb (VERY low carb) high fat seems to be working for me, the only thing I miss being a crispy roast spud on a Sunday, and I've become a little evangelical about this way of eating TBH. Such an easy way to improve your health whether you have diabetes or not. Peace and love to you and I hope you have a beautiful day x
You are correct. My fasting glucose was 8.7 this morning. Thanks for all the info. I am slowly changing habits of a life time.In my opinion, moment-to-moment, or meal-to-meal blood glucose concentration is not the best marker of control in type 2 diabetes. It will go up and down like the waves of the ocean (as you are seeing), but it doesn’t really tell you the level of the tide, and it definitely doesn’t tell you what is happening to your insulin profile. A better measure of monitoring your overall metabolic health - the long game as I call it - is your fasting glucose in the morning. It’s a more meaningful gauge of where you are in the spectrum of insulin resistance, which is what one should want to know if attempting to reverse metablic dysfunction as opposed to managing blood glucose from one meal to the next. The latter only tells you how much of a glucose load you are currently putting into your body, or by how much you are “topping up”.
This is of course a personal choice, and I’m merely making the distinction between the two approaches. Some may disagree, but this mindset has worked miracles for me personally, and is based on endless research and self-experimentation. Others may find a different path works for them, or indeed they may not be searching for a path, and would rather manage the condition day-to-day. That’s fine too, but expect to see blood glucose results like this, pretty much forever.
You are correct. My fasting glucose was 8.7 this morning. Thanks for all the info. I am slowly changing habits of a life time.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?