M
I've worked in the health care sector for 30 years, I've looked after people with conditions as mentioned above in different settings, I've very rarely come across people with diabetes as the cause of their condition. to me its a new phenomenon, I'm looking after more people who do have diabetes. im saying that these conditions existed well before diabete arose. Many people who developed Alzheimer's in fact have been fit, active, No reason for them to develop the condition.
Although in many respects diabetes is just another symptom of metabolic syndrome. Apparently along with chronic inflammation, CVD & CHD, Alzheimer’s disease, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension. The list goes on. Basically pretty much all of the modern non communicable degenerative ailments. The etiology of which is now increasingly believed to be hyperinsulinemia. And prediabetes, at its core, is hyperinsulinemia. For clarity I am most certainly not suggesting that “prediabetes” will necessarily kill, but it’s most certainly not “safe”. It’s the precursor to major problems in the future if not taken seriously...
Although in many respects diabetes is just another symptom of metabolic syndrome. Apparently along with chronic inflammation, CVD & CHD, Alzheimer’s disease, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension. The list goes on. Basically pretty much all of the modern non communicable degenerative ailments. The etiology of which is now increasingly believed to be hyperinsulinemia. And prediabetes, at its core, is hyperinsulinemia. For clarity I am most certainly not suggesting that “prediabetes” will necessarily kill, but it’s most certainly not “safe”. It’s the precursor to major problems in the future if not taken seriously.
As always, only in my opinion.
My interpretation as a lay person who is classified as such is that it is embryonic Type 2 diabetes. A version of Type 2 if you will. But I stand to be corrected.I do not understand “pre diabetes.”
My interpretation as a lay person who is classified
Hi @Alison Campbell , looking at your HbA1c stats, although they go back further than mine, they are not so radically different.In the UK we need at HBA1C of 42 or above for the classification now although it used to be also based on fasting plasma glucose above 6 or failing an oral glucose tolerence test.
I'm sad to say I got the "hat trick".
Any reason for that? I tend to state I am prediabetic because the difference between 41 and 42 is negligible really.
I was a pre / border line diabetic for years before I finally stepped over the line into T2 territory five years ago.My question is: Can a person die from pre-diabetes per se?
Sorry. No I wasn’t questioning your status, just trying to understand things a bit better. And trying to understand my own position bit better. Comparing notes if you like.Ok I thought you might not be in the UK as pred levels are different in different places eg US it is 39/40 or 5.8 in old money.
I was not questioning your status but you question mine.
Ok there is no prediabetes in remission definition/status and most of the type 2's in remission around here are doing a lot better me so I think pre-d fits. What do you think?
I consider my high blood pressure and diabetes T2 diet controlled as two seperate conditions and not related, only a coincidence.
Hypertension is very much part of metabolic syndrome.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?