shaddy4616
Member
- Messages
- 5
- Type of diabetes
- Treatment type
- Tablets (oral)
Hi @shaddy4616 , welcome to the forum.Hi , please could someone show me a chart with the different levels on .
I have googled it but I get lots of very different results and it’s very confusing.
Thanks
Hi @shaddy4616 , welcome to the forum.
Can you please tell us what kind of chart you're looking for?
Is it blood glucose levels or hba1c?
And what country are you in? Units in which those are measured in are different depending on where you live.
Hi ,
Yes that the sort of thing I was looking at on line but there are so many and some seem to say my results are in the green and others say it’s worse so I’m a bit confused with it all .
My results say 64/7.2 .
That’s correct, I think in your previous post it may just have been a typing errorMy results say 56 and I looked on line at a chart to get the 7.2 conversion
I don’t think that’s the case with OP (But I may be wrong) I read as they are looking at the chart and looking at the old way of the HbA1c (7.2) and the new way 56, my surgery still gives HbA1C in “old & new money” as some people apparently still work in the old wayForget any comparisons for now, you are trying to compare two different units like millimetres and inches.
The 56 is a Hba1c result, it is a measurement of how much glucose has stuck to your blood cells over their lifetime of around 12 weeks.
Below 42 is normal, 42 - 47 is pre diabetic, above 47 is T2 , so at 56 you are not massively high but we'll into the diabetic range
You could be right, even so this diabetes malarkey is confusing enough without getting Hung up on what units old or new have been used.I don’t think that’s the case with OP (But I may be wrong) I read as they are looking at the chart and looking at the old way of the HbA1c (7.2) and the new way 56, my surgery still gives HbA1C in “old & new money” as some people apparently still work in the old way
Well, 56 is a diabetic number, but not too bad... Just a slight change in diet could get you back into the normal range, lickedy-split. Why do you want to do the conversion? I'm thinking you're looking for a number with a decimal because you're seeing a lot of those here? But that's not a HbA1c, that's what the blood sugars are doing right now, it's a different test and measurement. My last HbA1c was 36 mmol/mol which is an average of three months worth of blood glucose (6.0 in old money). My current blood glucose is, just test for the heck of it, let's see.... Ah, it's a 6,3 mmol/l, because of the slightly decadent brunch I just had. Whatever the case may be, as I may be way off... Yep, your HbA1c is a diabetic one, but your numbers aren't dramatically bad. And whether you change your diet to get it down, or go the medicinal route, or a combo of those two, you should be able to get your blood sugars under control. You'll be okay, and that's the main thing.My results say 56 and I looked on line at a chart to get the 7.2 conversion
I am confused by the comments.Sorry I got it totally mixed up View attachment 63653
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?