cholesterol/2 types LDL?

I'd trust your doctor more than some youtuber. There's a lot of online fear mongering about statins, but they are the number one most prescribed drug for a good reason.
About LDL size, I believe the current consensus is that particle size does matter to some extent, but it's not that large ones are harmless - that's an unfortunately widespread misconception. Here's a good explainer on it

Alternative being the operative word there.

Westley said:

Alternative being the operative word there.

Butter nonsense: the rise of the cholesterol deniers

A group of scientists has been challenging everything we know about cholesterol, saying we should eat fat and stop taking statins. This is not just bad science – it will cost lives, say experts

www.theguardian.com

Click to expand...

I would note that I have a strong prejudice against articles in the Guardian, but that is just me.

I also have a strong prejudice against statins due to previous bad experiences.

Suffice it to say that butter is one of my mainstays, and as I am approaching 75 with recent good blood pressure checks I am not convinced that butter is bad for me.

Edit: that article is from 2018 and science may well have moved on since then.

Edit #2: I really should have read the article before diving in.
"A high-fat diet is the secret to a healthy life, they say. Enjoy your butter and other animal fats. Cheese is great. Meat is back on the menu.".
Preach!!
Meat, cheese and butter are mainstays of my diet.

“The claims that blood LDL cholesterol levels are not causally related to cardiovascular disease (which is really in the same realm as claiming that smoking does not cause cancer) are factually false,”
However it is suggested that cholesterol levels in the blood are not directly related to cholesterol in the food that we eat.
It is suggested that much/most cholesterol is manufactured from carbohydrates.
Ancel Keys and "you are what you eat" caused at least a generation's worth of confusion.

I am finding this article somewhat biased, but note my views on the Guardian.
I note the use of the term "dissidents" is used very frequently.

Noting that statins do have their place, especially for those who have already had a heart attack.
I recall that when I was diagnosed in 2008 I was prescribed a statin because the risk of a heart attack for someone with T2 diabetes was the same as the risk for a non-diabetic who had already had a heart attack.
It seemed reasonable at the time, but later it was realised that the risk might be the same, but the causes were not, so that argument was dropped.

If you don't like the Guardian as a source that's fine, but note that it's not just the journalist giving their own opinion, but quoting top experts from major health bodies.
If you prefer some different and more recent sources for similar content:
Or

Also to give context to that "Cheese is great. Meat is back on the menu." bit you quote for any that didn't open the link, it is included in the article only as an example of the sorts of views espoused by lipid denialists, and the following sentence is:

This is more than bad science, according to leading scientists and medical authorities. It will cost lives. “Encouraging people to eat more saturated fat is dangerous and irresponsible,” is a typical verdict, in this case from Prof Louis Levy, the head of nutrition science at Public Health England (PHE). “There is good evidence that a high intake of saturated fat increases your risk of heart disease. We need to think about where the sources of saturated fat are and how we can reduce them. The largest contributions are dairy products, including butter, and meat and meat products.”

Click to expand...

I'm not clear on the relevance of that lawsuit to this discussion. It looks like the Daily Mail failed to meet good journalistic standards, which doesn't massively surprise me from what I know of that paper, and were rightly ruled against. However that judgment is in no way a confirmation or support of Kendrick/Harecombe's writings.

That would be 'Dr' Berg, who is in fact not a medical doctor despite the impression his social media might give. In his bio he says
"Since graduating from chiropractic school, most people call me Dr. Berg"

Dr. Gil Carvalho (who is an actual accredited medical doctor and has a PhD in biology https://www.truehealthinitiative.org/council_member/4125/) has this video fact checking some of these claims by Berg:


Key point - large LDL is still associated with increased cardiovascular risk