Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Management
Other Health Conditions and Diabetes
Cholesterol and Statins
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Outlier" data-source="post: 2554356" data-attributes="member: 550046"><p>You have stated the very essence of 'proving a negative' by your correct use of 'probabilty'. It is so easy for research 'probabilities' to be trotted out as 'facts'. The rest I hope I have already explained by reference to all the other individual circumstances that make us individuals in health terms as well. Thus sweeping statements allegedly based on research must be questioned, otherwise the important results tend to be diluted by surmise and inference, which is a huge pity as the result is that none of it is trustworthy or to be taken at face value. look at all the nonsense we diabetics get, from the Eatwell plate onwards. Research or bias? Health or profit? The only way to keep research trustworthy is to challenge it in those areas where it is weak.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Outlier, post: 2554356, member: 550046"] You have stated the very essence of 'proving a negative' by your correct use of 'probabilty'. It is so easy for research 'probabilities' to be trotted out as 'facts'. The rest I hope I have already explained by reference to all the other individual circumstances that make us individuals in health terms as well. Thus sweeping statements allegedly based on research must be questioned, otherwise the important results tend to be diluted by surmise and inference, which is a huge pity as the result is that none of it is trustworthy or to be taken at face value. look at all the nonsense we diabetics get, from the Eatwell plate onwards. Research or bias? Health or profit? The only way to keep research trustworthy is to challenge it in those areas where it is weak. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Management
Other Health Conditions and Diabetes
Cholesterol and Statins
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…