- Messages
- 11,582
- Type of diabetes
- I reversed my Type 2
- Treatment type
- Diet only
@AndBreathe You seem to have a good experience with regard to how forums operate and you have highlighted and suggested some change.
The internal team have taken on board all the points your post has shown, and are taking necessary measures to ensure what can be done within their guidelines and management approval to improve the site.They also responded instantly to your original Post.
Why do you need dates and answers so quickly knowing how in-house systems operate. It is a bit like the team having to answer a audit report that was not required in the first place.
Guys - I'm almost regretting posting this thread now. If we want to argue about stuff, could we please have separate threads, or this will simply end up locked again.
We don't wish to promote nor encourage any arguments here .
Nor transfer any future arguments to separate threads .
Thanks Scardoc! I don't get much positive feedback from this forum, personally. I'm doing my best here and I do greatly appreciate any positive feedback I getGiverny - the forum works very well and has done for a long time. Like anything on Gods Green Earth, what comes out is only as good as what goes in!
Keep on doing what you do as without you and your fellow admin bods there would be no forum. I don't know how much supportive feedback you got but the negative tends to outweigh it. I for one, thank you.
There is no huge problems that can arise from allowing users to operate more than one account (and equally no real benefit to the site), so I won't be making any changes to the rules with regards to this in the foreseeable future. If it does become a problem, however, then I will consider altering the rules.I honestly don't see any argument going on here. A simple question regarding multiple accounts has been asked (why are they allowed, what purpose do they serve) and not answered in a way that addresses members' concerns as expressed. Aren't we meant to be dealing with transparency here?
(Sorry @AndBreathe I would have opened a new thread but admin don't seem to want that either).
We don't wish to promote nor encourage any arguments here .
Nor transfer any future arguments to separate threads .
Arguments and bickering are not positive within the forum .
Highly negative actually .
Only serves to inflame a thread and isn't anyway supportive at all .
why thank you, jackyou jack, are a man among men, seldom in my lifetime have I encountered someone with such good looks and intellect
RAOTFLMAO!why thank you, jack
I think you are someone who stands head and shoulders above the rabble too
lol this NOTjack412 sounds like a really nice guy. I'd like to offer to do his ironingwhy thank you, jack
I think you are someone who stands head and shoulders above the rabble too
@AndBreathe Thank you for attempting to gather constructive feedback for the betterment of forum. I appreciate your efforts, even if others don'tX
Absolute agreement.
It would be a wonderful thing if people didn't undermine efforts like this by introducing personal theories and debates.
AndBreathe asked a question, and got answers.
Some of them may not have been what we were hoping for, but hey ho. That's life.
No need for it to degenerate into opening old, festering sores.
. People who have been banned usually know why.
I did
@AndBreathe Thank you for attempting to gather constructive feedback for the betterment of forum. I appreciate your efforts, even if others don'tX
why thank you, jack
I think you are someone who stands head and shoulders above the rabble too
I'm still here supporting that wonderful member, jack412, I hang on his every word and agree with everything that wonderful person says
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?