I’ve written about this under Type 1 and Teacher post below and I’d really appreciate any advice or examples of a risk assessment for a secondary T1 teacher. (I was shielding and I know NEU advise work from home for this category. ) we will be asked to do extra lunch duties and I don’t think I can handle more contact with extra students! I’ve not asked but I’m wearing visor AND mask and will ask for this to be put on my risk assessment etc whenever I get it...back on Tuesday
My school isn't doing individual risk assessments.
As I understand things, the employee does not have to be present during the risk assessment process.
I'll get it at some point unless down here in Sussex
Of course people who don't like working from home should be allowed back to the office, and the employers should put up screens/arrange rotas etc to make the office safe for them. But for those who are able, and prefer working from home it is an excellent way to help the wider community by keeping public transport clearer for those who really need it, and keeping their own businesses working and producing which helps the economy.Home working works well for employees with space and facilities at home. Working at the dining room table for 8 hours a day on a chair which was design to sit on for 30 minutes at a time with poor lighting, kids/dogs/ partners running around and then having to clear up at the end of each day so you have space to eat whilst not socialising with your colleagues or getting your daily walk to the office is does not work well for lots of people.
I appreciate not everyone experiences this scenario but those who had not planned to work from home when the bought and furnished their house or those who consider socialising a key reason why they leave the house every day, ... are not finding working from home works for them.
Last time I looked there had been under 3,000 "cases" from a population of 860,000 in West Sussex so about 0.35 of the population have tested positive. Where I live in Worthing the figures look like thisView attachment 43595
You'll have to make a real effort to find anyone with it to infect you!
From here
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51768274
I'll let you know what comes back in my risk assessment. I've never had one before so don't know what they look like but I'll keep you up to speed.
Re extra lunch duties I'm not sure but maybe you could request playground duties outside rather than lunch halls?
I was promised a risk assessment by my head on Wednesday. This was after she had assessed me as low risk-so no more risk than a healthy 30 year old (I’m 59, 60 in Feb). I contacted my union, they said moderate risk according to NHS guidelines. I emailed my GP who emailed back in moderate risk. I emailed this to my head who promised my own risk assessment on Wednesday. As yet, this has not been received. I return to school with children on Wednesday.
Yes very high.. (odd that you focussed on that part) until you consider that Worthing is the 8th oldest town in the UK by average age and has a large number of care homes.I'm useless with figures. Is that a lot of deaths to ratio of cases?
Yes very high.. (odd that you focussed on that part) until you consider that Worthing is the 8th oldest town in the UK by average age and has a large number of care homes.
According to our neighbour who works in Senior Care social services at least half of the care homes were infected and some lost pretty significant parts of their residents so...
Independent Sage were interesting yesterday. In a nutshell it all comes down to the difference between should and will! The government have only said employers should make workplaces covid safe. There are no legal requirements to do so or any legislation to ensure a workplace must be inspected and declared safe before opening. If it is unsafe you can contact the decimated HSE but by the time they can do anything,well..I'm starting to hear this a lot sadly. Same with me, both Union and GP say under their breath that you should be working from home, blah, blah, blah, but then just say they have to go by government guidelines, which of course if anyone reads the news have been flawed to say the least, and that's putting it politely!
Part of me wants to write letters to GP, Government and Union etc to be posted retrospectively saying basically "I told you so" but at then end of the day who really cares bar ourselves?! It really seems to be a case now of, (if I can ridiculously quote Spock from Star Trek to add a touch of black humour!) "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one!" Although I picture Boris as a rather unlikeable Romulan or Klingon instead of Captain Kirk rushing to the rescue!
What I find baffling is that all this could have been quite easily avoided. With many people not even wanting to be in lockdown and plenty not even believing in this virus why did the government furlough everyone they did? Surely a targeted furlough of the at most risk would have made more sense and those who wanted "everything to be normal" could have carried on if they wished to. Then the government may have got their "herd immunity" without risking the vulnerable and would have have been able to continue furlough for longer. Wouldn't have helped those of us not on furlough mind!!
They say you should learn from your mistakes but I'm not seeing anyone learning from the 1918/19 Spanish Flu. Second wave was worse than the first and Boris seems to be approaching winter in the same way that General Custer approached Little Big Horn!
My school isn't doing individual risk assessments.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?