Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Off-Topic
General Chat
COVID vaccination
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oldvatr" data-source="post: 2335223" data-attributes="member: 196898"><p>The admission that they were sufficiently on the ball to detect that something unexpected was going on, and to diagnose it as being that the first dose was diluted, then instigating full dose for the follow up tranche gives me some confidence in their safety monitoring. indeed they halted the trials twice when someone had an adverse reaction that they had to resolve before they resumed also shows they were dealing responsibly with the feedback data.</p><p></p><p>Just seen a CDC spox in USA on CNN discuss this dichotomy of "wannit now" vs "wait for more testting" and they say that the first couple of hundred thousand (200K) sessions will be followed up and used to give a further 3 months of safety data that will be shared for peer review too. Does not necessarily apply to Borisland but we can but hope NICE will be in that loop too. The trouble is that lmg term data implies long term wait, unless accelerated methods are used which would undermine the faith in that science too. Part of the delay in authorising the vaccines now is publish and peer review of the safety data by independent reviewers, so hopefully there is no kickback involved there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oldvatr, post: 2335223, member: 196898"] The admission that they were sufficiently on the ball to detect that something unexpected was going on, and to diagnose it as being that the first dose was diluted, then instigating full dose for the follow up tranche gives me some confidence in their safety monitoring. indeed they halted the trials twice when someone had an adverse reaction that they had to resolve before they resumed also shows they were dealing responsibly with the feedback data. Just seen a CDC spox in USA on CNN discuss this dichotomy of "wannit now" vs "wait for more testting" and they say that the first couple of hundred thousand (200K) sessions will be followed up and used to give a further 3 months of safety data that will be shared for peer review too. Does not necessarily apply to Borisland but we can but hope NICE will be in that loop too. The trouble is that lmg term data implies long term wait, unless accelerated methods are used which would undermine the faith in that science too. Part of the delay in authorising the vaccines now is publish and peer review of the safety data by independent reviewers, so hopefully there is no kickback involved there. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Off-Topic
General Chat
COVID vaccination
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…