Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Off-Topic
General Chat
COVID vaccination
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oldvatr" data-source="post: 2339369" data-attributes="member: 196898"><p>The MMR report in BMJ is only talking about the effect in children and is conjecture, Its a 'maybe happen'. The Covid vax has a lower age limit of 16 but will not be given to this group until the previous 9 tranches of patients have already been processed and monitored. The Oxford vaccine is undergoing a special trial expansion to specifically test the pediatric response and also I believe in pregnancy. The emergency license will exclude these groups if and when it is granted. This I suggest would provide more extensive data for trend analysis.</p><p></p><p>The second one is a statement that shows that compensation is available if a vaccine proves to be harmful. This is good to know but is not giving any examples where it has stepped in to pay compensation.</p><p></p><p>The third one shows how to make a claim but again does not show where claims were made in the past.</p><p>So no, none of those is a proper answer to my challenge. </p><p></p><p>The MMR vaccine is held up by many to be the smoking gun, but so far no one has managed to prove any causal link, and the vaccine is still being offered without restriction. The link between MMR and autism has been shown to be a fraudulent statement by one disputed HCP. and is not upheld in any court of inquiry, of which there have been several.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oldvatr, post: 2339369, member: 196898"] The MMR report in BMJ is only talking about the effect in children and is conjecture, Its a 'maybe happen'. The Covid vax has a lower age limit of 16 but will not be given to this group until the previous 9 tranches of patients have already been processed and monitored. The Oxford vaccine is undergoing a special trial expansion to specifically test the pediatric response and also I believe in pregnancy. The emergency license will exclude these groups if and when it is granted. This I suggest would provide more extensive data for trend analysis. The second one is a statement that shows that compensation is available if a vaccine proves to be harmful. This is good to know but is not giving any examples where it has stepped in to pay compensation. The third one shows how to make a claim but again does not show where claims were made in the past. So no, none of those is a proper answer to my challenge. The MMR vaccine is held up by many to be the smoking gun, but so far no one has managed to prove any causal link, and the vaccine is still being offered without restriction. The link between MMR and autism has been shown to be a fraudulent statement by one disputed HCP. and is not upheld in any court of inquiry, of which there have been several. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Off-Topic
General Chat
COVID vaccination
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…