Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Off-Topic
General Chat
COVID vaccination
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="StamfordMan" data-source="post: 2341715" data-attributes="member: 471773"><p>It's very interesting that the push for mandatory vaccination only really became aggressive once the 1986 Childhood Vaccination Injury Act was passed in the USA. The taxpayer was presented with the tab for any vaccine injuries from that point onwards and the Act removed the rights of people to sue the vaccine manufacturers for death or disability caused by their products. Subsequent changes to the rules have made it virtually impossible to claim for vaccine-related injuries in the USA. The equivalent system in the UK limits any claims for vaccine-related injuries to a one-off payment of £120 000 and it takes years and a completely disproportionate effort to make a successful claim for that pittance.</p><p></p><p>Freeing the manufacturers of vaccines from any risk of liability claims opened up the taps for turning what was a fringe product that produced a profit across the industry of only $250 million dollars a year. That profit has become $250 billion a year in 2020, and it's expected to double in the next decade. </p><p></p><p>There's an enormous amount of money to be made in vaccines. The background to this is that a new drug that is brought to market that makes a profit of $1 billion a year has been the first prize for the Pharmaceutical industry for some time now. </p><p></p><p>Thus, it's not surprising that there's a huge push to make vaccines mandatory everywhere and to challenge people's rights to refuse vaccines for any reason at all. The drive to vaccinate has become a quasi-religious quest in our time. Anyone who does not accept the official dogma of the Church of Vaccination is guilty of heresy, and to even <em>imply</em> that there's anything wrong with a widely used vaccine will bring the full wrath of the Vaccine Inquisition down on your head, as Andrew Wakefield experienced in the UK. Do not dare to challenge the Church of Vaccination's dogma. It's deleterious to your career in medicine. If you happen to observe anything that contradicts the Wisdom of St Fauci, keep your head down, and your mouth shut.</p><p></p><p>That's not how Science works. There's no such thing as "Scientific Consensus". There always has to be room for dissenters in Science. Galileo Galilei was persecuted for challenging the Church's belief that the Earth is flat and that the Sun revolves around the Earth. Alfred Wegener faced almost universal derision when he proposed his Theory of Plate Tectonics in 1912, but guess what? It was ultimately accepted by the Scientific community and now no one opposes Wegener's Theory. So, there's no "consensus" that vaccines are safe and effective. It remains to be proven either way, and the methods of the Inquision are not how Science advances.</p><p></p><p>What would close the book on the "Vaccination Debate" would be a longitudinal study that compares the health of unvaccinated children versus fully vaccinated children from birth to adulthood. A properly designed randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study would be the definitive way to settle the matter. Why has such a study not been conducted already?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="StamfordMan, post: 2341715, member: 471773"] It's very interesting that the push for mandatory vaccination only really became aggressive once the 1986 Childhood Vaccination Injury Act was passed in the USA. The taxpayer was presented with the tab for any vaccine injuries from that point onwards and the Act removed the rights of people to sue the vaccine manufacturers for death or disability caused by their products. Subsequent changes to the rules have made it virtually impossible to claim for vaccine-related injuries in the USA. The equivalent system in the UK limits any claims for vaccine-related injuries to a one-off payment of £120 000 and it takes years and a completely disproportionate effort to make a successful claim for that pittance. Freeing the manufacturers of vaccines from any risk of liability claims opened up the taps for turning what was a fringe product that produced a profit across the industry of only $250 million dollars a year. That profit has become $250 billion a year in 2020, and it's expected to double in the next decade. There's an enormous amount of money to be made in vaccines. The background to this is that a new drug that is brought to market that makes a profit of $1 billion a year has been the first prize for the Pharmaceutical industry for some time now. Thus, it's not surprising that there's a huge push to make vaccines mandatory everywhere and to challenge people's rights to refuse vaccines for any reason at all. The drive to vaccinate has become a quasi-religious quest in our time. Anyone who does not accept the official dogma of the Church of Vaccination is guilty of heresy, and to even [I]imply[/I] that there's anything wrong with a widely used vaccine will bring the full wrath of the Vaccine Inquisition down on your head, as Andrew Wakefield experienced in the UK. Do not dare to challenge the Church of Vaccination's dogma. It's deleterious to your career in medicine. If you happen to observe anything that contradicts the Wisdom of St Fauci, keep your head down, and your mouth shut. That's not how Science works. There's no such thing as "Scientific Consensus". There always has to be room for dissenters in Science. Galileo Galilei was persecuted for challenging the Church's belief that the Earth is flat and that the Sun revolves around the Earth. Alfred Wegener faced almost universal derision when he proposed his Theory of Plate Tectonics in 1912, but guess what? It was ultimately accepted by the Scientific community and now no one opposes Wegener's Theory. So, there's no "consensus" that vaccines are safe and effective. It remains to be proven either way, and the methods of the Inquision are not how Science advances. What would close the book on the "Vaccination Debate" would be a longitudinal study that compares the health of unvaccinated children versus fully vaccinated children from birth to adulthood. A properly designed randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study would be the definitive way to settle the matter. Why has such a study not been conducted already? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Off-Topic
General Chat
COVID vaccination
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…