Hi again,
Been thinking about this... Diabetes.
So? As a matter of course. Police involvement will take witness statements regarding an RTA (I think it used to be referred to.) or is it an RTC now?
Along with a breathalizer test of the drivers involved..
As a matter of protocol with an "insulin dependant" the law would require a BS result to eliminate that "factor" too?
However. In my experience with getting stopped by the law this has never happened though. I have passed a breath test during a DD Christmas "campaign".. (Of course!)
My point? Not all police officers notice a "restricted licence" or question why so... If they do (the case with me once in Holland) the average copper doesn't understand Diabetes..
Sooooo? Sorry to do this
@Vincetoon . What could you have said in a statement that might have "incriminated" you to this point of the proceedings?
Or were you subject to a 20 meter number plate eye test at the "scene" during an investigation by a police officer involved?
I'm making an assumption the law was involved in this incident & not another driver "trying it on" after an exchange of details....
By the way. Rib fracture can be caused by the seat belt catching someone in the inertia..
I once sustained a fractured rib in an assault & was asked by a professional during treatment if I was in a car accident due to the injury location..