Pheebs said:Yeah that's understandable, but what I mean is that a bad hypo can affect mobility, not that they are a common occurrence for me but I am aware of how debilitating they can be. Also, for instance you have a few hypos on a long journey and haven't got enough supplies with you to correct it, you may need to go to a shop promptly and park on double yellows to do so. Just a thought.
donnellysdogs said:Personally, I think the quicker they bring in laws for persons that have wheelchairs to have blue badges only, the better.
noblehead said:donnellysdogs said:Personally, I think the quicker they bring in laws for persons that have wheelchairs to have blue badges only, the better.
Sorry donnellysdogs but I do not agree with the above. I have known and know people now who have multiple sclerosis, severe back/leg pain and conditions such as ME who are unable to walk more than a few yards but don't use a wheelchair, by parking as close to their destination they are able to remain independent and lead a near-normal life as possible without relying on others. Often disabilities are invisible to the naked eye and it would be wrong to assume anyone other than wheelchair users are not disabled and unworthy of a blue badge.
Nigel
Pheebs said:In many people's eyes it does mean a disability. I wouldn't class it that way at all. I appreciate that you would've dealt with the situation accordingly had you stopped to talk to someone, but can you also appreciate that for some Policemen and women this isn't the case?
Yep.....I'm not so daft to think all Coppers are perfect. I've seen some things that make me cringe but that doesn't make all Coppers insensitive and bad people. Most are just ordinary folk with a job to do. Sometimes they get it wrong and should be taken to task, but on the whole the majority are good people with plenty of common sense. Luck of the draw I suppose if you happen to have a c*ap one deal with you ! I hope that never happens.
Most of the time there are warning symptoms, I know almost immediately that I'm having a hypo. BUT having said that, it is common knowledge that people with very very good control often lose their warning symptoms. So, in that case, on one hand they are praised for their excellent hba1c levels and recognised as a healthy diabetic, but in the case of having a hypo at the wheel, even if they had all of the tools to correct it in the car, they could, realistically, be persecuted?! Can't win!
Prosecuted......maybe, not persecuted. Like I said, that is 'victim' mentality. Do something wrong whether that is deliberate or accidental........then claim persecution. Sorry, heard that one too many times to take any notice of it. Having diabetes is a balancing act, get it right and everything is fine, get it wrong, as in having little or no hypo awareness and that is something that has to be addressed. Which is why too tight a control particularly in T1 is sometimes a bad thing. It's not just your own Diabetes you have to think about but also the effect it could have on others, hypo at the wheel can be catastrophic.......for more than just the driver. Seen the results of just that over the years. Not a pretty sight.
I think feeling persecuted is a massive difference in opinion for us all. I don't feel persecuted by people in general most of the time, but there are some comments which would make me feel otherwise. And some insurance companies that definitely suggest otherwise.
Pheebs said:This seems to be the point that many are missing. I agree with what you are saying, and I believe most of us who drive are responsible. Again, we can all be caught unaware, what I want to know is that if this happens, we won't be persecuted against. I'm pretty sure that for those who disagree with what i'm saying, if you were subjected to a penalty on your license because you'd pulled over being caught unaware to treat a hypo your opinion would soon change. No matter how much lucozade or glucose tablets you had in the car. What i'm saying is things happen, I just feel we carry a heavier penalty than what we should. Every circumstance should be looked in to individually and for the most part, it's not.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?