Hi all.
Bit of background. ..GD diagnosed 2011 straight onto insulin, then diagnosed Type 2 in 2012.
Tried oral meds, no effect and finally put on insulin (after a long fight with my docs) in feb.
Now today my doc has agreed to do an antibody test after refusing to refer me to the hospital clinic like I requested!
My question is : has anyone had their diagnosis changed purely from having the gad antibody test? What we're your results?
Also, after reading up, I read that the antibody test should be done before insulin therapy :/ does that mean it's pointless?
I just want to make sure I've got the right diagnosis
...but according to the latest NICE Guidelines, the GAD test is less reliable as the years pass after diagnosis whereas the c-peptide becomes more reliable. Taking insulin shouldn't affect the GAD test, I believe, and even the c-peptide as only the body's insulin creates c-peptide?GAD antibodies can persist for many years after diagnosis of T1
http://www.diapedia.org/type-1-diabetes-mellitus/gad-antibodies
What it actually says is...but according to the latest NICE Guidelines, the GAD test is less reliable as the years pass after diagnosis whereas the c-peptide becomes more reliable. Taking insulin shouldn't affect the GAD test, I believe, and even the c-peptide as only the body's insulin creates c-peptide?
autoantibody tests have their lowest false negative rate at the time of diagnosis, and that the false negative rate rises thereafter
C-peptide has better discriminative value the longer the test is done after diagnosis
with autoantibody testing, carrying out tests for 2 different diabetes‑specific autoantibodies, with at least 1 being positive, reduces the false negative rate. [new 2015]
Of course this probably indicates there is still some presence of working beta cells and the people in these long term cohorts are the 'survivors' Recent studies also show that many long term T1s still produce some, tiny amounts of insulin.(hence an ongoing autoimmune destruction, and antibodies)Autoantibodies have previously been shown to remain detectable in two thirds of patients during the 10 years after
diabetes onset, and in some cases may increase in titre [9]. Our results now show a remarkable persistence of GADA in long term survivors of type 1 diabetes, both in terms of autoantibody frequency and titre. IA-2A and ZnT8Awere also presentin patients with long-duration diabetes, but at lower frequency than GADA, and with reduced antibody levels
DittoI was changed to LADA from T2 after GAD test.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?