Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 2 Diabetes
Did a plant base diet ever work for metabolic syndromes?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Beating-My-Betes" data-source="post: 2382846" data-attributes="member: 532959"><p>Do you have any data to show why he shouldn't be?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Firstly, I'm not sure those who are seeing results are experiencing actual lows, but I'm guessing you are describing the lowering back to normal. The rise (spike is a bit of a loaded term) is expected, hence the testing at 90-120 post-prandial and the use of tri-monthly average. But again, if you have some solid data for why this undulation - a normal physiological response to the ingestion of carbs - is not healthy.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not sure how the Pareto Principal (Pretty sure that's what you're referring to) is relevant to these accounts, but I would definitely be curious to see the percentages for success rate, distinguished by those who just couldn't stick to the plan and those for whom the plan actually caused real issues. Perhaps I'll try to find that out. Either way, it's probably not too far off a guess to suggest that the majority of those who are finding success on the WFHCLFPBD, at one point or another, absolutely weren't able to deal with the foods you've listed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Beating-My-Betes, post: 2382846, member: 532959"] Do you have any data to show why he shouldn't be? Firstly, I'm not sure those who are seeing results are experiencing actual lows, but I'm guessing you are describing the lowering back to normal. The rise (spike is a bit of a loaded term) is expected, hence the testing at 90-120 post-prandial and the use of tri-monthly average. But again, if you have some solid data for why this undulation - a normal physiological response to the ingestion of carbs - is not healthy. Not sure how the Pareto Principal (Pretty sure that's what you're referring to) is relevant to these accounts, but I would definitely be curious to see the percentages for success rate, distinguished by those who just couldn't stick to the plan and those for whom the plan actually caused real issues. Perhaps I'll try to find that out. Either way, it's probably not too far off a guess to suggest that the majority of those who are finding success on the WFHCLFPBD, at one point or another, absolutely weren't able to deal with the foods you've listed. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 2 Diabetes
Did a plant base diet ever work for metabolic syndromes?
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…