I'd be interested to see what diet advice others received in truth.
Myself, usual healthy diet, the eat well plate, that we all appear to love to demonise.
.
So, yes, it was the correct advise at the time, and if you take the effort to work it out, a portion controlled, "healthy" diet of about 2000 calories, with 1/3 made up of fairly low GI foods is 700 calories, or 175 g of carbs.
But then, it's not even that, as a lot of the carbs they suggest are fibre, so I don't see the demons force feeding sugar into us here.
..
Hi douglas99.
'the eat well plate that we all appear to love to demonise', as you call it, includes 'PLENTY of potatoes, bread, rice, pasta and other starchy foods '.
On another thread today you advised a poster to 'Avoid classic bad foods first. ... potatoes, white rice, white pasta, white bread, anything like that.
Personally, I avoid all root veg, most rice apart from a bit of basmati occasionally, all pasta, as I test myself and know they spike me'.
So you clearly believe that the eat well plate is wrong. WHY do you find it so distressing to say this, or to suggest that the NHS is giving bad advice?
It may have been correct for you but that doesn't make it correct for everyone. My diet before diagnosis was very different from yours - I'd been on the Slimming World plan for years. Nothing fried, tiny amounts of low-fat cheese and fat-free yoghurt, unlimited lean meat or fish and as much veg and complex carbs as I wanted, apart from the fact that bread was limited to a couple of slices of wholemeal at most. No white bread or rice, no mashed spuds. I cut out all sugar apart from the stuff the 'healthy eating' industry crams into it's fake foods. The diet sheet my doctor gave me and the advice on the training session were the same as the SW guidelines. I was encouraged to eat 'masses' of fruit as snacks. I didn't have anything like 2000 calories a day pre-diagnosis, nor 175g of carb.
Whether we take our carbs as potato or pure sugar by the spoonful, it still ends up as glucose so your comment about being force-fed sugar is irrelevant, although if we're told by our doctors to eat piles of carbs of ANY Kind, we may as well be force-fed sugar. the GI Index makes very little difference to my body's reaction - high GI send the level up high and fast but it comes down fairly quickly, lower GI send it up to a lower spike level and over a longer timescale but take much longer to return to normal.
My gripe with the NHS is that they give the same advice to everyone without having any idea about their previous lifestyle and diet - it's one size fits all and just get on with letting them prescribe ever-increasing medication. My GP is happy with patients who routinely have a pre-breakfast BG of anything under 9. It also seems that as a body they have no idea that Type1 and Type2 are different. My brother is type1 and adjusts his insulin according to his carb intake and BG level. I can't do that so have to adjust my food intake according to my BG level.
The correct way to advise Type2s should be to issue them with meters and tell them that the NHS diet sheet is a rough guide only and a starting point for them to use as a basis for their self-management.
Surely it's our prerogative to post as we see fit!
Personally I've had two bad experiences with my GPs concerning diabetic care, which has damaged my faith in them! No doubt there are many decent teams out there, but conversely there are bad ones too. You are a prolific poster, have picked a lot of brains and received very helpful, insightful information. Sorry, but I don't understand why you are now being critical of those who feel they have little support or a poor rapport with their HCT and choose to voice it here.
The correct way to advise Type2s should be to issue them with meters and tell them that the NHS diet sheet is a rough guide only and a starting point for them to use as a basis for their self-management.
I think you have done more than 'tune' your diet -- you avoid starchy carbs and the NHS positively urges their consumption. The way that you have 'tuned' your diet matches what many other diabetics have found to be a necessary way of changing the NHS recommendations. You are in good company. Why not join us in suggesting that the NHS advice can be positively harmful to the newly-diagnosed who are not equipped with testing strips and do not for a moment think that they can question or adapt what the NHS recommends?
I'm not attacking you -- quite the opposite. I'm also not attacking the NHS -- I have actually had pretty good support. It's because I believe in the NHS that I think it is so wrong that in this instance they are providing bad advice. Surely we should be trying to help them change it?
Can someone tell me just what the bad advice is that the NHS give to diabetics
To condense my previous posts into one sentence, the advice I got was 'Don't test, leave that to us, follow this high-carb diet and if things don't seem any better in 6 months we'll increase your medication'. No mention that the diet may need tweaking (at the very least!). actively discouraged from self-testing and encouraging a culture of sit back and let the tablets do all the work.
No thats not what my DN told me to doTo condense my previous posts into one sentence, the advice I got was 'Don't test, leave that to us, follow this high-carb diet and if things don't seem any better in 6 months we'll increase your medication'. No mention that the diet may need tweaking (at the very least!). actively discouraged from self-testing and encouraging a culture of sit back and let the tablets do all the work.
So isI think you have done more than 'tune' your diet -- you avoid starchy carbs and the NHS positively urges their consumption. The way that you have 'tuned' your diet matches what many other diabetics have found to be a necessary way of changing the NHS recommendations. You are in good company. Why not join us in suggesting that the NHS advice can be positively harmful to the newly-diagnosed who are not equipped with testing strips and do not for a moment think that they can question or adapt what the NHS recommends?
I'm not attacking you -- quite the opposite. I'm also not attacking the NHS -- I have actually had pretty good support. It's because I believe in the NHS that I think it is so wrong that in this instance they are providing bad advice. Surely we should be trying to help them change it?
Hi Annie. I agree not all NHS teams are poor. My DN is superb and I'm really grateful that I now have her to support me with my insulin. There are various problem areas of diabetes advice that have become obvious to me both personally and thru this forum over the last few years. Diet advice is the biggest problem and is not so much due to poor nurses but due to their training. If you track this back you find the poor advice goes beyond this country even and originates from some very weak and scientifically suspect research data coming from a small number of published papers. The food industry as always lurks around in the background. Have you read today's papers regarding sugar? The National Geographic, a well respected Mag, had an article on sugar late last year describing it as a poison. Although DUK remains backward ref carbs, the American Diabetes Association has changed it's diet advice over the last year or so to be more negative about carbs and the trend continues. So my criticism of NHS db advice is that it is centrally driven and GPs/DNs are obliged to follow that advice. What has been nice over recent months is that more posters are saying their DNs have recommended a more balanced approach to the food plate. If you go back a few years the 'Eat plenty of starchy cabs' advice was very common.
With respect, that's not the point. You asked what advice we'd been given and I told you what mine was. Saying that you weren't told that doesn't alter the fact that I was.No thats not what my DN told me to do
With respect, that's not the point. You asked what advice we'd been given and I told you what mine was. Saying that you weren't told that doesn't alter the fact that I was.
There was no figure suggested, just a lot of menu ideas that would have given a diet very high in carbs with not much room for anything else. I've just dragged the sheet out of the kitchen drawer as a reminder - one suggested breakfast was baked beans on 2 slices of wholemeal toast, followed by a banana. That's over 70g of carb to start the day with. Lunch - a large baked potato (another 25-30gm) with salad and low-fat cheese then an apple chopped into a Mullerlight yoghurt (another 14 or so for the yoghurt and 20-ish for the apple) then an evening meal of a lentil-based shepherds pie (yet another potato at 25 and around 50 for the lentils) Add in the mid-morning fruit, half pint of skimmed milk and 2 rich tea biscuits as a bedtime snack and you can add another 80g to that so we're talking a total of over 300g of carbs being an acceptable intake. I had far less than that before I was diagnosed.What was the amount of carbs they told you to eat as high carb?
The most recent comment by my diabetes consultant who was initially v sceptical of Low Carb diet as she equated it with Atkins and had concerns re the amount of protein (made on the basis of the improvements seen in my bloodwork), was " low carb is the way to go, if you can stick to it, but unfortunately most of my patients cant / wont make the type of changes needed"
There was no figure suggested, just a lot of menu ideas that would have given a diet very high in carbs with not much room for anything else. I've just dragged the sheet out of the kitchen drawer as a reminder - one suggested breakfast was baked beans on 2 slices of wholemeal toast, followed by a banana. That's over 70g of carb to start the day with. Lunch - a large baked potato (another 25-30gm) with salad and low-fat cheese then an apple chopped into a Mullerlight yoghurt (another 14 or so for the yoghurt and 20-ish for the apple) then an evening meal of a lentil-based shepherds pie (yet another potato at 25 and around 50 for the lentils) Add in the mid-morning fruit, half pint of skimmed milk and 2 rich tea biscuits as a bedtime snack and you can add another 80g to that so we're talking a total of over 300g of carbs being an acceptable intake. I had far less than that before I was diagnosed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?